Abstract

The unconfined compression test (UCT) is one of the most common tools to measure the undrained shear strength of fine-grained soils. Soft to very soft soils often pose problems such that the determination of failure load is unclear using this test. Similarly, fissured clays would endeavor failure along pre-existing planes of weakness. The reverse extrusion test (RET), a mechanical metallurgy tool, has been used recently in some soil mechanics applications. The scope of this investigation is to evaluate the potential of the RET as a substitute for the UCT. Sixty remolded soils and 75 natural soils were subjected to the RET and UCT. Remolded soils were tested on mixtures prepared at the plastic limit. It was found that the ratio of extrusion pressure at failure to the undrained shear strength is relatively consistent and concentrates around 14. The same ratio was found to be 15 for natural soils. The conclusion reached, upon a series of tests on both the remolded and natural soil samples, is that the RET better represents the undrained shear strength of soil than does the UCT, that the practical difficulties with UCT is eliminated by the RET, and the results may be improved by taking into account soil plasticity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call