Use of continuity of care index to examine care quality among latino children with asthma

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Continuity of care (COC) a foundational dimension of primary care, has demonstrated associations with a range of patient outcomes. Still unknown are its relationship with measures of health equity, especially along disease specific utilization measures in primary care. Understanding if specific features of the clinician-patient relationship, such as language concordance, are associated with beneficial ambulatory care measures in Latino children with asthma might provide insight into the relationship between COC and health equity. <h3>Objective:</h3> Analyze the association between clinician language and inhaled steroids (commonly prescribed first-line asthma management medications) modified by patient-level continuity score. <h3>Study Design:</h3> Retrospective observational study. <h3>Setting or Dataset:</h3> OCHIN, a US network of community health centers. <h3>Population studied:</h3> Non-Hispanic White children, English-preferring Latino children, Spanish-preferring Latino children with documented Spanish-speaking clinicians, and Spanish-preferring Latino children without documented Spanish-speaking clinicians between the ages of 3-18 years with ≥1 face-to-face visit in 2005-2017 and persistent asthma (N=6915). <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Odds of inhaled steroid prescription assessed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) logistic regression adjusting for patient-level covariates. <h3>Results:</h3> Among patients with high continuity of care (COC&lt;0.70), Spanish-preferring Latino children (seeing both English- and Spanish-speaking clinicians) had similar odds of ever being prescribed an inhaled steroid compared to non-Hispanic whites. However, English-preferring Latino children had lower odds of being prescribed an inhaled steroid compared to non-Hispanic whites (OR=0.57, 95%CI=0.41-0.79). Among patients with low continuity (COC&lt;0.70), the likelihood of an inhaled steroid prescription were similar for all groups except Spanish-preferring Latinos who see Spanish-speaking clinicians; that group had 2.5 times higher odds of having an inhaled steroid prescription compared to non-Hispanic whites (OR=2.56, 95%CI=1.80-3.66). <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Language preference and concordance, considering continuity of care, were associated with inhaled steroids in children with persistent asthma. While further study into provider-level continuity and other factors is needed to fully understand inhaled steroid utilization, these results may help clinics target patients experiencing less equitable prescribing.