Abstract

This study empirically investigates whether the US quantitative easing (QE) policy significantly mitigates a firm’s default risk by focusing on firms with differential levels of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Analyzing US firms’ data from 31,182 firm-year observations from 2000 to 2014, during QE implementation, we find that firms with better CSR performance showed a lower distance to default conditioning in extreme monetary expansion. Firms exhibited lower default risk during the US QE policy, but QE might generate adverse effects resulting from increased risk premiums and volatility for equities and low-grade corporate bonds, thereby increasing overall default probability. Our robustness tests not only considered various CSR dimensions and components but also used an alternative estimation method to improve the quality of default risk estimates.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.