Urologists’ Approach to Nocturia: Routine vs. Standardized Approach

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare the effect of urologists’ routine approach and standardized approach on disease management and treatment results in patients suffering from nocturia. Material and Methods: The study was designed as a non-randomized prospective cohort study between March and July 2023. In the first stage, the routine clinical approach of 6 urology specialists was evaluated. Demographic data, comorbidities, baseline nocturia number, quality of life, and multidisciplinary approach preference of the patients were recorded (Group 1). In the second stage, the patients’ demographic data, comorbidities, and additionally the voiding diary and “Targeting the individual’s Aetiology of Nocturia to Guide Outcomes” (TANGO) questionnaire were questioned (Group 2). All patients were re-evaluated in the first month of the treatments/recommendations given. The difference in the multidisciplinary approach and the change in the number of nocturia and the quality of life of the patients were compared between the two approaches. Results: Forty-seven patients were included in each group. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients in both groups were statistically similar. Charlson’s comorbidity index was higher in Group 2 (p=0.01). The multidisciplinary treatment approach was at a higher level in Group 2 (59.6% vs 8.5%, p=0.001). While the average number of nocturia decreased from 4.6 to 2.19 in group 1, it decreased from 5.15 to 1.21 in group 2. In the first month, the number of nocturia and quality of life scores were lower in group 2. The decrease in the average number of nocturia and quality of life in group 2 was statistically significantly higher than in group 1. Conclusion: In the approach to nocturia, questioning comorbidities and applying multidisciplinary management provides more meaningful results in nocturia treatment and increase the quality of life.