Abstract

ObjectiveElevated serum uric acid is commonly observed in women with preeclampsia, but its utility in predicting adverse outcomes has recently been disputed. Our goal was to analyze data from a large cohort of women with preeclampsia to determine the utility of serum uric acid in predicting adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. MethodsData were obtained from an ongoing international prospective study of women admitted to hospital with preeclampsia (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk). Univariate logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between serum uric acid concentration (both absolute and gestational-age corrected [Z score]) and adverse outcomes (maternal and perinatal). Analyses were conducted to compare cohorts of women with preeclampsia as defined by hypertension and proteinuria versus hypertension and hyperuricemia. ResultsUric acid Z score was associated with adverse perinatal outcome (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.4 to 1.7) and had a point estimate>0.7 (area under the curve receiver operating characteristic 0.72; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.74). Serum uric acid concentration also showed a significant association with adverse maternal outcomes, but the point estimate was<0.7. No significant differences were observed between groups in which preeclampsia was defined by hypertension and proteinuria and by hypertension and hyperuricemia. ConclusionIn women admitted to hospital with preeclampsia, the serum uric acid concentration, corrected for gestational age via a Z score, is clinically useful in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes but not maternal outcomes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call