The French Ambulatory Cesarean Section: Safety and Recovery Characteristics

Abstract

ObjectivesThe French AmbUlatory Extraperitoneal Cesarean Section (FAUCS) is aimed at improving patients’ birth experience and recovery. However, data are scarce regarding its maternal and neonatal safety. This study seeks to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between FAUCS and conventional cesarean deliveries at term. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study involving women who underwent scheduled cesarean deliveries at term. We compared a total of 810 cases using the FAUCS technique with 217 cases using conventional cesarean deliveries. Surgical complications, adverse neonatal events, and maternal recovery parameters were compared. ResultsThe incidence of overall surgical complications was comparable between the 2 groups, with rates of 1.97% for FAUCS and 1.85% for the conventional cesarean deliveries. The rates of specific complications such as bladder injury (0.1%), bowel injury (0.1%), blood transfusion (1.35%), and postpartum hemorrhage (1%) were consistent with existing literature. Neonatal outcomes, including neonatal acidemia and admission rates to the neonatal intensive care unit, were comparable between the groups and demonstrated favourable comparisons with previously reported data. Notably, women in the FAUCS group required less analgesia, with only 0.8% receiving morphine, as opposed to 38% in the control group. Furthermore, the FAUCS group demonstrated significantly quicker recovery, with 86% achieving autonomy and early discharge at their discretion within 48 hours after operation, in contrast to only 17% in the control group. ConclusionsWhen performed by experienced practitioners, FAUCS proves to be a safe procedure, with no increased risk for maternal or neonatal complications. Its significant benefits in terms of enhancing maternal recovery are noteworthy.