Abstract
Uranium mineralization is commonly accompanied by enrichment of fluorite and other F-bearing minerals, leading to the hypothesis that fluoride may play a key role in the hydrothermal transport of U. In this paper, we review the thermodynamics of U(IV) and U(VI) complexing in chloride- and fluoride-bearing hydrothermal fluids and perform mineral solubility and reactive transport calculations to assess equilibrium controls on the association of F and U. Calculations of uraninite and U3O8(s) solubility in acidic F-rich (Cl : F = 100 [ppm-based]) hydrothermal fluids at 25–450°C, 600 bar, show that U(IV)-F complexes (reducing conditions) and uranyl-F complexes (oxidizing conditions) predominate at low temperature (T<~200°C), while above ~250°C, chloride complexes predominate in acidic solutions. In the case of uraninite, solubility is predicted to decrease dramatically as U(IV)Cl22+ becomes the predominant U species at T>260°C. In contrast, the solubility of U3O8(s) increases with increasing temperatures. We evaluated the potential of low-temperature fluids to upgrade U and F concentrations in magnetite-chalcopyrite ores. In our model, an oxidized (hematite-rich) granite is the primary source of F and has elevated U concentration. Hydrothermal fluids (15 wt.% NaCl equiv.) equilibrated with this granite at 200°C react with low-grade magnetite-chalcopyrite ores. The results show that extensive alteration by these oxidized fluids is an effective mechanism for forming ore-grade Cu-U mineralization, which is accompanied by the coenrichment of fluorite. Fluorite concentrations are continuously upgraded at the magnetite-hematite transformation boundary and in the hematite ores with increasing fluid : rock (F/R) ratio. Overall, the model indicates that the coenrichment of F and U in IOCG ores reflects mainly the source of the ore-forming fluids, rather than an active role of F in controlling the metal endowment of these deposits. Our calculations also show that the common geochemical features of hematite-dominated IOCG deposits can be related to a two-phase process, whereby a magnetite-hematite-rich orebody (formed via a number of processes/tectonic settings) is enriched in Cu ± U and F during a second stage (low temperature, oxidized) of hydrothermal circulation.
Highlights
Many hydrothermal uranium (U) ores are accompanied by high concentrations of fluorine (F) in the form of fluorite and/or other F-bearing minerals such as fluorapatite [1,2,3,4]
The enrichment of fluorine is an important feature of many IOCG-mineralizing systems, including Olympic Dam (OD) [6, 8] and Ernest Henry in Australia [9, 10]; Salobo
Since the simulations indicated that some uranyl hydroxide complexes may be important as well, we review the sources and reliability of these complexes
Summary
Many hydrothermal uranium (U) ores are accompanied by high concentrations of fluorine (F) in the form of fluorite and/or other F-bearing minerals such as fluorapatite [1,2,3,4]. Such U-mineralizing systems include IOCG, orogenic U deposits, and volcanogenic and vein-type deposits hosted in felsic rocks [2, 5,6,7]. The enrichment of fluorine is an important feature of many IOCG-mineralizing systems, including Olympic Dam (OD) [6, 8] and Ernest Henry in Australia [9, 10]; Salobo [11] and Igarape Bahia [8] in the Carajás district, Brazil; and
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have