Abstract
A variety of blankets for fusion reactors were neutronically analyzed to determine the fusion energy multiplication factor (M), the heavy metal fission rate, the fissile atom production rate, and tritium production. The blankets studied were:thorium metal, ThO2, ThC2, uranium metal, UO2, UC, and UC2 fast-fissioning blanketsnonfissioning thorium metal blanketsblankets that multiply neutrons in a 238U region and use those neutrons to breed tritium and 233U in a separate zoneberyllium, niobium, and molybdenum neutron-multiplying 233U breeding blankets.The important conclusions are:For maximum production of thermal energy throughout the fuel cycle per fusion neutron, plutonium breeding is preferable, with one exception: If high-conversion-ratio thermal fission reactors with recycle are used, uranium neutron-multiplying Th-233U breeding blankets hold a slight edge.Metallic fuels offer a significant breeding gain over oxides or carbides. With a 1 MW/ m2 neutron first-wall loading, typical burnups in the metals are 0.024 to 0.4%/yr, indicating that the metals are viable fuel concepts.One substantially reduces the fissile breeding rate to obtain a nonfissioning configuration in thorium.Thorium blankets of almost any type consistently fail to outperform plutonium breeding or uranium neutron-multiplying 233U breeding blankets on the basis of neutron utilization and total energy production.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.