Abstract

BackgroundThroughout most of sub-Saharan Africa (and, indeed, most resource-limited areas), lack of death registries prohibits linkage of cancer diagnoses and precludes the most expeditious approach to determining cancer survival. Instead, estimation of cancer survival often uses clinical records, which have some mortality data but are replete with patients who are lost to follow-up (LTFU), some of which may be caused by undocumented death. The end result is that accurate estimation of cancer survival is rarely performed. A prominent example of a common cancer in Africa for which survival data are needed but for which frequent LTFU has precluded accurate estimation is Kaposi sarcoma (KS).MethodsUsing electronic records, we identified all newly diagnosed KS among HIV-infected adults at 33 primary care clinics in Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, and Malawi from 2009 to 2012. We determined those patients who were apparently LTFU, defined as absent from clinic for ≥90 days at database closure and unknown to be dead or transferred. Using standardized protocols which included manual chart review, telephone calls, and physical tracking in the community, we attempted to update vital status amongst patients who were LTFU.ResultsWe identified 1222 patients with KS, of whom 440 were LTFU according to electronic records. Manual chart review revealed that 18 (4.1%) were classified as LFTU due to clerical error, leaving 422 as truly LTFU. Of these 422, we updated vital status in 78%; manual chart review was responsible for updating in 5.7%, telephone calls in 26%, and physical tracking in 46%. Among 378 patients who consented at clinic enrollment to be tracked if they became LTFU and who had sufficient geographic contact/locator information, we updated vital status in 88%. Duration of LTFU was not associated with success of tracking, but tracking success was better in Kenya than the other sites.ConclusionIt is feasible to update vital status in a large fraction of patients with HIV-associated KS in sub-Saharan Africa who have become LTFU from clinical care. This finding likely applies to other cancers as well. Updating vital status amongst lost patients paves the way towards accurate determination of cancer survival.

Highlights

  • Throughout most of sub-Saharan Africa, lack of death registries prohibits linkage of cancer diagnoses and precludes the most expeditious approach to determining cancer survival

  • Most attempts at cancer survival estimation in sub-Saharan Africa come from facility-based samples, which suffer from uncertain representativeness and have high rates of patients ceasing to return to care without knowledge of their vital status

  • In an attempt to overcome the problem that lost to follow-up (LTFU) presents for cancer survival estimation in Africa, we developed a process whereby we sought after patients who had become LTFU in order to update their vital status

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Throughout most of sub-Saharan Africa (and, most resource-limited areas), lack of death registries prohibits linkage of cancer diagnoses and precludes the most expeditious approach to determining cancer survival. A prominent example of a common cancer in Africa for which survival data are needed but for which frequent LTFU has precluded accurate estimation is Kaposi sarcoma (KS). Accurate survival estimation requires a representative sample (if not census) of patients diagnosed with a particular malignancy as well as knowledge of vital status in all patients following diagnosis. In resource-rich settings, accurate estimation of cancer survival is achieved by combining data from well-curated cancer registries (to identify the cases) and death registries (to ascertain vital status) [1]. Most attempts at cancer survival estimation in sub-Saharan Africa come from facility-based samples (i.e., clinical care), which suffer from uncertain representativeness and have high rates of patients ceasing to return to care without knowledge of their vital status (a phenomenon termed “lost to follow-up” — LTFU). Because it is unwise to assume that patients with cancer who cease to return to care experience similar survival as those whose vital status is documented, accurate survival estimation in the face of sizeable LTFU is precluded

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call