Abstract
Many psychiatric education programs distribute reading lists to students and residents but these lists rapidly become out of date. The authors polled experts in 20 psychiatric specialty areas, asking for up to ten recent publications of lasting value. Nearly 1300 citations were received from over 200 respondents. The authors discuss the Jack of consensus by experts in areas such as neurobiology and psychopharrnacoiogy as well as the much higher proportion of books (versus articles) cited by experts from psychosocial compared to biological specialty areas.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
