Update on the diagnosis of recurrence of lower limb deep vein thrombosis. A Consensus statement of the French Society for Vascular Medicine (SFMV)

Abstract

An accurate diagnosis of lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) recurrence is mandatory. The diagnosis is difficult and has not been well investigated. Our objective was to define the role of clinical probability assessment, D-dimer assay, venous ultrasound and other imaging methods in the diagnosis of this condition based on a review of published data.Our review did not find any clinical prediction rule (CPR) specific to the diagnosis of DVT recurrence. D-dimer assays have not been sufficiently validated or proved effective either alone or when combined with the assessment of clinical probability or with ultrasound. The only validated ultrasound criteria are a new non-compressible vein segment and a ≥ 2 mm or ≥ 4 mm increase in diameter of the common femoral or popliteal vein under compression in the transverse plane between two examinations. Limitations of these criteria include poor inter-observer agreement, non-availability of previous ultrasound reports and measurements, a high percentage of non-diagnostic ultrasound results, lack of power in diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic management studies, and lack of external validation. The analysis of venous obstruction, thrombus appearance, vein diameter and blood flow based on colour Doppler ultrasound criteria has not yet been validated in studies. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) is a new promising diagnostic imaging method, but is hardly accessible, costly and needs large scale validation studies. Based on this review, an update of the guidance for clinical practice is proposed for the diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected lower-limb DVT recurrence