Abstract
With reference to the Supreme Court case City of Toronto v. Ontario (Attorney General) and decisions from Reference re Secession of Quebec and other legal cases, unwritten constitutional principles are defined, and their nature as being foundational to Canadian legal practice is highlighted. This paper discusses the nature of unwritten constitutional principles and their role in Canadian legal practice. The textualization of these principles can be considered redundant as they are observed in both the judiciary and the legislature. This paper also emphasizes arguments for why the origins of these specific legal principles are being referenced. The ultimate issue is that there must be an attempt by relevant actors to maintain consistency of the law and the treatment of Canadians - the judiciary or the legislature, or both, can take this action.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
