Abstract
Background and Objectives: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a significant global health challenge, necessitating effective renal replacement therapies. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers a patient-friendly, home-based alternative to hemodialysis. The Stepwise Initiation of Peritoneal Dialysis (SIPD) method, used in the SPD group and involving a gradual introduction of PD, presents a potential advantage over traditional protocols, yet the scientific literature on its efficacy and safety is limited. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 39 end-stage renal disease patients undergoing SIPD and 78 patients receiving conventional PD (CPD) at a single center from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2023. Patients were matched for age and sex. Surgical techniques, early and late complications, infection rates, and catheter survival were evaluated. Data were analyzed using statistical methods, including the chi-square test, t-test, and negative binomial regression. Results: The mean break-in period was significantly more extended for the SPD group (176.05 ± 154.39 days) compared to the CPD group (26.87 ± 58.45 days). Early complications were similar between groups, but late complications, including peritonitis, were significantly higher in the CPD group. The SPD group experienced fewer infection events (28 vs. 80, p = 0.043). Median catheter survival times were 1486 days for SPD and 1774 days for CPD, with no statistical difference. Age was a significant factor in peritonitis incidence, increasing with age in both groups. Conclusions: Our study suggests that SPD may reduce the incidence of catheter-related infections and peritonitis compared to CPD. The extended break-in period in SPD could enhance tissue healing and reduce biofilm formation, thereby contributing to fewer infectious complications. Despite these findings, no significant difference in overall catheter survival was observed. Further multi-center studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to confirm these results and explore the economic impact of SPD vs. CPD.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
