Abstract
ABSTRACT Recent academic research exhibits considerable disagreement among ESG ratings from different agency providers. The consequences of this disagreement on the market are still under-explored; thus, we investigate whether this disagreement impacts the cost of equity capital. Using a sample of 23,201 firm-month observations from January 2019 to March 2021, we find that ESG disagreement positively moderates the negative relationship between the average ESG score and cost of equity. By disentangling the aggregate ESG score, we find that the moderating effect of this disagreement does not hold for any pillar. Furthermore, the association between ESG rating disagreement and cost of equity is more pronounced in the presence of high analyst information uncertainty. Overall, our findings highlight that ESG rating disagreement jeopardizes investors’ confidence in ESG ratings and weakens the role of these ratings in reducing the cost of equity, pointing to the need to improve convergence across agency providers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
