Abstract
AbstractThe reported apparent large decrease in 1J(C‐α, H‐α) by 1.75±0.20 Hz on replacement of one of the olefinic protons by deuterium in trans‐stilbene is due to improper first‐order analysis of the 1H‐coupled 13C spectrum of the parent compound. Consequently, the implied conformational difference between trans‐stilbene and α‐deuterio‐trans‐stilbene, which was used to explain the result, is not substantiated.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
