Abstract
[Extract] Aceituno et al’s systematic review of economic evaluations of early intervention in psychosis (EIP)1 is an example of the use of spin to misrepresent advantages of EIP, a topic reviewed elsewhere.2 Although it refers to standard protocols for systematic reviews, it does not critically analyse the collected articles, leading to wildly optimistic conclusions.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
