Abstract
One important aspect of human cognition involves the learning of structured information encountered in our environment, a phenomenon known as statistical learning. A growing body of research suggests that learning to read print is partially guided by learning the statistical contingencies existing between the letters within a word, and also between the letters and sounds to which the letters refer. Research also suggests that impairments to statistical learning ability may at least partially explain the difficulties experienced by individuals diagnosed with dyslexia. However, the findings regarding impaired learning are not consistent, perhaps partly due to the varied use of methodologies across studies – such as differences in the learning paradigms, stimuli used, and the way that learning is assessed – as well as differences in participant samples such as age and extent of the learning disorder. In this review, we attempt to examine the purported link between statistical learning and dyslexia by assessing a set of the most recent and relevant studies in both adults and children. Based on this review, we conclude that although there is some evidence for a statistical learning impairment in adults with dyslexia, the evidence for an impairment in children is much weaker. We discuss several suggestive trends that emerge from our examination of the research, such as issues related to task heterogeneity, possible age effects, the role of publication bias, and other suggestions for future research such as the use of neural measures and a need to better understand how statistical learning changes across typical development. We conclude that no current theoretical framework of dyslexia fully captures the extant research findings on statistical learning.
Highlights
An important question is whether dyslexia is characterized by deficits specific only to reading and language or if the learning difficulties are more global in nature
Because learning spoken and written language appears to be supported by statistical learning processes in typical development, it is a distinct possibility that some language disorders – including dyslexia – might arise from a deficit in or irregularities with statistical learning
We suggest that multipledeficit theories that focus on the confluence of cognitive, behavioral, neurophysiological as well as environmental factors might be best suited for understanding the complex interplay of factors that lead to dyslexia (Pennington et al, 2012)
Summary
An important question is whether dyslexia is characterized by deficits specific only to reading and language or if the learning difficulties are more global in nature. Lum et al.’s (2013) analysis is suggestive of such an effect, the two more recent reviews above raise the issue of publication bias, which calls this conclusion into question Having used these three meta-reviews as a springboard, the aim of the section is to examine statistical learning in dyslexia by focusing on studies published after the three meta-analyses and reviews, which incorporate a broader range of tasks than just SRT and AGL. All studies examine statistical learning (broadly construed to include any task assessing the learning of patterns) in children and adolescents (Table 1) and adults (Table 2) with dyslexia None of these studies were extensively discussed in either of the three meta-analyses described earlier, or recent reviews on the current topic (Schmalz et al, 2017; Sawi and Rueckl, 2019; Bogaerts et al, 2020).
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have