Abstract

Research on learning styles often focuses on the learning style of the student; however, the learning style of the educator may affect instructional choices and hinder learning. Few studies have addressed the lack of knowledge that exists in universities with respect to educators’ learning styles and a lesson framework (development, delivery, and debriefing). This sequential mixed methods study explored university educators’ conscious, reflective instructional choices as they related to learning styles application within a lesson. Two theoretical and one conceptual frameworks drew on Kolb’s experiential learning theory, Bloom’s, Reigeluth’s, and Gagné’s instructional design theories and models, and Fiddler’s and Marienau’s events model of learning from experience. Research questions addressed learning styles, usage patterns, instructional choices, and reflections of university educators within a lesson framework. An online inventory recorded 38 university educators’ instructional choices, learning styles, and learning styles patterns within the framework of a lesson. Interviews were conducted with 7 of the university educators to document their conscious reflections regarding their instructional choices. Results from the inventory identified that more than 56% of university educators applied the accommodation learning style during the stages of development and delivery of a lesson, and 34% applied the assimilation learning style during the debriefing stage, which were supported by detailed reflections about their instructional choices in relation to their learning styles. The knowledge acquired about learning styles applications during a lesson framework may benefit university educators’ teaching, which are foundational to affecting positive social change within academic and social communities.

Highlights

  • University educators are critical contributors to the development of programs, courses, and lessons

  • Given that a learner developed his or her learning style preferences prior to becoming a university educator, and given that both learning and teaching style preferences derived from the same individual who moved from one role to the other, it is with alacrity that the university educator’s learning style preferences influence the decisions he or she makes when determining reflective instructional choices such as course and lesson content, assignment and assessment activities, delivery and presentation media, and debriefing and reflective approaches to lesson creation

  • Conscious instructional choices of educators during a lesson framework, the results from the inventory identified that more than 56% of university educators applied their dominant learning style of accommodation during the stages of development and delivery of a lesson

Read more

Summary

Introduction

University educators are critical contributors to the development of programs, courses, and lessons. Given that a learner developed his or her learning style preferences prior to becoming a university educator, and given that both learning and teaching style preferences derived from the same individual who moved from one role to the other (learner to educator), it is with alacrity that the university educator’s learning style preferences influence the decisions he or she makes when determining reflective instructional choices such as course and lesson content, assignment and assessment activities, delivery and presentation media, and debriefing and reflective approaches to lesson creation. This study examined the relationship between conscious reflective instructional choices and learning styles within the framework of a lesson

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.