Abstract

National level experiences, lessons learnt from the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) era coupled with the academic evidence and proposals generated by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) together with the economic arguments and recommendations from the World Bank Group’s "Essential Surgery" Disease Control Priorities (DCP3) publication, provided the impetus for political commitments to improve surgical care capacity at the primary level of the healthcare system in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) as part of their drive towards universal health coverage (UHC) in the form of World Health Organization (WHO) Resolution A68.15. This global commitment from governments must be followed up with development of a Global Action Plan and a global coordination mechanism supported by regional implementation frameworks on the part of the WHO in order for the organisation to better coordinate all stakeholders and sustain the technical support needed to develop and implement national surgical health policy in the form of National Surgical Obstetric and Anaesthesia Plans (NSOAPs). As expounded by Gajewski et al, data and research output on surgical care is essential to informing policy development and programme implementation. This area still remains a challenge in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) but it is envisaged that countries will include this key component in their ongoing national surgical healthcare policy development and programme implementation. In the Zambian case study, research in the area of Global Surgery investment-the surgical workforce scale-up is used to demonstrate the important role of implementation research in the development and implementation of the Zambian NSOAP as well as the need for international collaborations to this end. Scale-up reviews informed by implementation research to evaluate progress on the commitments contained in Resolution A68.15 and Decision A70.22 are essential to sustain the momentum and to help maintain focus on the gaps in all countries. There are opportunities for non-state actors especially local sub-regional academic institutions, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and private sector to play a key role in surgical healthcare policy development and implementation research. Collection of and better information management of standardised surgical care indicators is essential for such research, for bi-annual WHO progress reporting and for demonstration of impact to justify and encourage further investments in surgical care.

Highlights

  • While the effort to advance access to safe and affordable surgery and anaesthesia care may be as old as the two domains themselves, it is not far from the truth for one to state that it’s only in the recent past that surgery and anaesthesia care have seen the light of day in as far as being part of the global public health and development agenda is concerned

  • With the 2015 transition from the silo creating and disease specific global Millennium Development Goals (MDGs); One of whose pitfalls was the lack of integration across sectors[1] that supported disease specific health programmes at country level, to the multisectoral, multi-disciplinary, integrated and cross-cutting partnership approach towards sustainable development whose target is set at 2030,1,2 health still remains at the core of the new global development agenda.[3]

  • In order to translate global political commitments into national health policy and programmes that can further translate into tangible health service delivery in this regard, 3 years down the line since resolution WHA68.15; many lowand middle-income countries (LMICs) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are embarking on the development of their National Surgical Obstetric and Anaesthesia Plans[9] (NSOAPs) as the vehicle to improving universal access to safe and appropriate surgical and anaesthesia care within their primary health system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While the effort to advance access to safe and affordable surgery and anaesthesia care may be as old as the two domains themselves, it is not far from the truth for one to state that it’s only in the recent past that surgery and anaesthesia care have seen the light of day in as far as being part of the global public health and development agenda is concerned.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call