Abstract

Much current global debate – as well as a great deal of political rhetoric – about global health and healthcare is characterised by a renewed emphasis on the goal of universal access throughout the world. While this goal has been achieved to varying extents in the United Kingdom, Canada and many countries in Europe, even within those countries where national health systems have long been in place, the pervasive shift in emphasis from health as a social value to health as a commodity within a capitalist market civilization is eroding the commitment to equitable access to healthcare. Against this background the challenge is much greater in low- and middle-income countries that lag behind – especially if aspirations to universal access go beyond primary care. The challenges of achieving greater equity in access to health and in health outcomes, in a middle-income country like South Africa, illustrate the magnitude of the tensions and gaps that need to be traversed, given the vast differences between healthcare provided in the private and public sectors. Understandably the concept of National Health Insurance (NHI) in South Africa has widespread support. The strategies for how a successful and effective NHI could be implemented, over what time-frame and what it covers are, however, very controversial issues. What tends to be ignored is that sustainable improvement in health in South Africa, and elsewhere, is not determined merely by medical care but more especially by social structures intimately linked to deeply entrenched local and global social, economic and political forces and inequalities. While seldom openly addressed, some of these forces are explicated in this article to supplement views elsewhere, although most have elided emphasis on the pervasive effects of the global political economy on the provisioning and practising of health and healthcare everywhere on our planet.

Highlights

  • In the early 21st century the condition of the world embraces a complex set of interlinked and pervasive structural crises

  • Its most adverse components involve the combination of multi-dimensional socio-economic inequalities, environmental degradation[9] and climate change,[10] all driven by patterns of wasteful and often frivolous consumerism within a political order and market civilization where economic growth and profit dominate over public interests.[11,12]

  • This combination, more recently labelled a ‘planetary crisis,’[13] contributes to escalating humanitarian distress, internal displacements of millions of people and mass migrations of international refugees escaping from atrocious living conditions and conflict.[14]. It is in this global context that we must consider the question of universal access to healthcare – a goal widely stated as a global priority.[15]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the early 21st century the condition of the world embraces a complex set of interlinked and pervasive structural crises. Its most adverse components involve the combination of multi-dimensional socio-economic inequalities, environmental degradation[9] and climate change,[10] all driven by patterns of wasteful and often frivolous consumerism within a political order and market civilization where economic growth and profit dominate over public interests.[11,12] This combination, more recently labelled a ‘planetary crisis,’[13] contributes to escalating humanitarian distress, internal displacements of millions of people and mass migrations of international refugees escaping from atrocious living conditions and conflict.[14] It is in this global context that we must consider the question of universal access to healthcare – a goal widely stated as a global priority.[15] the realities of local and global conditions, configured by the dynamics of an ecologically unsustainable global political economy, have undermined pursuit of this goal.[16] The notion of universal access has become more rhetorical than real, and new principles and practices are needed to make it a more achievable goal. To understand why this goal has proven elusive we explore the case of a society which has sought to emancipate its collective future by ridding itself of the curse of apartheid: Full list of authors’ affiliations is available at the end of the article

Benatar and Gill
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.