Abstract

BackgroundWe previously reported on the association between ESR1 and ESR2 gene variants and heightened risk of breast cancer (BC). Here we investigated the association of common ESR1 and ESR2 gene variants with triple negative BC (TNBC). MethodsThis retrospective case-control study involved 488 BC patients (130 TNBC, 358 non-TNBC patients). ESR1 (rs2234693, rs9340799, rs3020314, rs3798577) and ESR2 (rs928554, rs944459, rs4986938, rs1256049, rs1256030, rs1271572) genotyping was done by real-time PCR. ResultsWhile minor allele frequencies (MAF) of ESR1 variants were comparable between TNBC and non-TNBC subjects, significantly higher ESR2 rs1256049 MAF was seen in TNBC patients. Significantly higher frequency of ESR1 rs3798577 T/C and C/C genotypes were noted in TNBC cases, and significant differences were seen in ESR2 rs928554, rs1256049, and rs1271572 genotype distribution. Increased TNBC risk was associated with ESR1 rs3798577 T/C and C/C genotypes according to codominant and dominant models, while positive association of ESR2 rs928554 with TNBC was seen according to codominant and recessive models, and positive association of ESR2 rs1256049 with TNBC was seen according to codominant and dominant models. Positive interactions were noted between ESR2 rs1271572-ESR1 rs3020314, ESR2 rs1271572-ESR1 rs9340799, and ESR2 rs1271572-ESR1 rs2234693, ESR2 rs4986938-ESR1 rs2234693, and ESR2 rs928554-ESR1 rs9340799. Haplotype analysis confirmed the positive association of ESR1 CATT with TNBC, while ACGGCTC and ACGGTT ESR2 haplotypes were positively associated with TNBC. ConclusionResults of this study confirmed the association of unique ESR1 and ESR2 genetic variants with altered risk of TNBC. This suggests possible diagnostic and prognostic role of these variants with TNBC independent of their association with BC.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call