Abstract

The origin of the in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy of epitaxial $\mathrm{Fe}(001)$ films on $\mathrm{GaAs}(001)$ has been controversially attributed either to a magnetoelastic interaction or to oriented interface bonds. In order to check the relevance of magnetoelastic contributions we performed magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) and magnetoelastic stress measurements on $\mathrm{Fe}(001)$ and ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{32}{\mathrm{Co}}_{68}(001)$ bcc epitaxial films on $\mathrm{GaAs}(001)$ in a thickness range from several monolayers (ML) up to 100 ML. The magnetoelastic coupling coefficient ${B}_{2}$ of 30 ML films is $+(8.4\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.4)\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\mathit{MJ}/\mathrm{m}}^{3}$ for $\mathrm{Fe}(001)$ and $\ensuremath{-}(23.2\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}3.7)\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\mathit{MJ}/\mathrm{m}}^{3}$ for ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{32}{\mathrm{Co}}_{68}(001)$, respectively. In spite of the opposite sign of ${B}_{2}$ for $\mathrm{Fe}$ and ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{32}{\mathrm{Co}}_{68}$, the same sign of the uniaxial anisotropy constant ${K}_{U}^{\mathrm{eff}}$ is experimentally observed. It is concluded that the magnetoelastic interaction is not the dominating contribution to the uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in these systems.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.