Unfractionated heparin monitoring by anti-factor Xa versus activated partial thromboplastin time strategies during venoarterial extracorporeal life support.

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

No clear guidelines exist for unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring in adult patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) for refractory cardiogenic shock. In this study, we sought to compare outcomes between anti-factor Xa (FXa) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) strategies for UFH monitoring during VA-ECLS. This is a single-center, retrospective review of VA-ECLS patients who received UFH in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit between July 2019 and November 2023. Standard protocol for UFH titration was aPTT goal of 45-60 sec (n = 52) before September 2021, then transitioned to FXa goal of 0.1-0.2 U/mL (n = 50) thereafter. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline differences between cohorts. In adjusted analyses, 89.3% of FXa patients and 76.0% of aPTT patients achieved goal range for their respective assay. Total UFH duration (4.0 vs 4.0 days, p = .239) and maximum weight-adjusted UFH dose (9.3 vs 9.4 U/hr/kg, p = .823) remained comparable between adjusted FXa and aPTT cohorts. Moreover, in-hospital mortality (50.3% vs 33.9%, p = .133), major bleeding events (20.6% vs 11.2%, p = .292), and thromboembolic events (30.1% vs 30.1%, p = .998) were not significantly different. Extracorporeal circuit thrombosis and cannula site bleeding were the most frequent events in both groups. Multivariate logistic regression found the FXa strategy was not a significant risk factor for the composite outcome of major bleeding or thromboembolism (OR [95% CI]: 1.539 [0.575, 4.116], p = .393). In adult VA-ECLS patients at our institution, bleeding and thromboembolic complications occurred at a similar rate regardless of which UFH monitoring strategy was utilized. Further studies in larger and more institutionally diverse cohorts are warranted.