Abstract

Commuting behaviour has been intensively examined by geographers, urban planners, and transportation researchers, but little is known about how commuting behaviour is spatially linked with the job and housing markets in urban cities. New Zealand has been recognised as one of the countries having the most unaffordable housing over the past decade. A group of middle-class professionals called ‘key workers’, also known during the pandemic as ‘essential workers’, provide essential services for the community, but cannot afford to live near their workplaces due to a lack of affordable housing. As a result, these key workers incur significant sub-optimal commuting. Such job-housing imbalance has contributed to a so-called spatial mismatch problem. This study aims to visualise the excess commuting patterns of individual workers using the Integrated Data Infrastructure (IDI) from Statistics New Zealand. The visualisation suggests that over the last demi-decade, housing unaffordability has partially distorted the commuting patterns of key workers in Auckland. More of the working population, in particular those key workers, are displaced to the outer rings of the city. While there is an overall reduction in excess commuting across three groups of workers, key workers remain the working population with a disproportionate long excess commute.

Highlights

  • Commuting is crucial to enabling individuals to access job opportunities [1,2,3]

  • This study aims to visualise the relationship between excess commuting and housing affordability, and emphasises that the commuting of key workers is more sensitive to housing costs compared to other working population

  • The results show that in 2013, the average commuting distances were 16.61 km, 15.19 km, and 15.53 km for key workers (KEY), retail trade (RET) workers, and finance-insurance workers (FIN), respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Commuting is crucial to enabling individuals to access job opportunities [1,2,3]. The urban economics literature argues that more accessible job opportunities close to workers’ residence can reduce commuting costs and mitigate the spatial mismatch [4,5]. Job-housing ratios at the district level are usually used to measure job-housing (im-)balance in an urban city, but many studies overlook the interactions of the commuting patterns of workers with the dynamics of housing affordability. Such a spatial mismatch is prominent amongst key workers. Key workers can be defined as the cohort of moderate-income earners who work in the public sector and provide services that are essential to the functioning and livability of cities [6,7,8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call