Abstract

ContextLandscape structure is thought to affect the provision of ecosystem service bundles. However, studies of the influence of landscape configuration on ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in urban areas are limited. This study used Bayesian Belief Networks to predict ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the urban area comprising the towns of Milton Keynes, Bedford and Luton, UK.ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to test (1) a Bayesian Belief Network approach for predicting ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in urban areas and (2) assess whether landscape configuration characteristics affect ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies.MethodsBayesian Belief Network models were used to test the influence of landscape configuration on ecosystem service interactions. The outputs of a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on six ecosystem services and landscape configuration metrics were used as response and explanatory variables, respectively. We employed Spearman’s rank correlation and principal component analysis to identify redundancies between landscape metrics.ResultsWe found that landscape configuration affects ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies. A sensitivity analysis conducted on the principal components showed that landscape configuration metrics core area (CORE) and effective mesh size (MESH) are strong influential determinants of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that landscape configuration characteristics affect ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies and that a core set of metrics could be used to assess ecosystem service (ES) trade-offs and synergies. The findings may be relevant to planning and urban design and improved ecosystem management.

Highlights

  • Landscape ecology studies the spatial relationships between functional land units, the abiotic and biotic processes between ecosystems and the change of landscape patterns over time

  • We examined the potential influence of landscape configuration on ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies by seeking answers to the following research questions: (i) does landscape configuration affect ecosystem service interactions, and (ii) can landscape configuration metrics be used to assess ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies? We hypothesized that landscape configuration could drive ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies and that a BBN modelling approach could be used to assess the influence of landscape structure on ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies

  • The scree plot shows the relationship between the increasing principal components of each metric and the cumulative proportion of variance explained

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Landscape ecology studies the spatial relationships between functional land units, the abiotic and biotic processes between ecosystems and the change of landscape patterns over time. Patch level refers to characteristics of an individual patch, i.e. pertaining to individual patches in a categorically-classified landscape. Class level refers to a set of patches of the same type, i.e. pertaining to a single patch type (land cover type) in a categorically classified landscape. Landscape level refers to the entire patch mosaics i.e. pertaining to the full extent of the data or, as in a hierarchy, the entire patch mosaic (in a categorically classified landscape). Trade-offs occur when the provision of one ES is reduced as a consequence of increased use of another ES (Rodrıguez et al 2006). This may be due to simultaneous response to the same driver or due to true interactions among services.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call