Abstract

The spatial patterns and processes of cities can be described with various entropy functions. However, spatial entropy always depends on the scale of measurement, and it is difficult to find a characteristic value for it. In contrast, fractal parameters can be employed to characterize scale-free phenomena and reflect the local features of random multi-scaling structure. This paper is devoted to exploring the similarities and differences between spatial entropy and fractal dimension in urban description. Drawing an analogy between cities and growing fractals, we illustrate the definitions of fractal dimension based on different entropy concepts. Three representative fractal dimensions in the multifractal dimension set, capacity dimension, information dimension, and correlation dimension, are utilized to make empirical analyses of the urban form of two Chinese cities, Beijing and Hangzhou. The results show that the entropy values vary with the measurement scale, but the fractal dimension value is stable is method and study area are fixed; if the linear size of boxes is small enough (e.g., <1/25), the linear correlation between entropy and fractal dimension is significant (based on the confidence level of 99%). Further empirical analysis indicates that fractal dimension is close to the characteristic values of spatial entropy. This suggests that the physical meaning of fractal dimension can be interpreted by the ideas from entropy and scaling and the conclusion is revealing for future spatial analysis of cities.

Highlights

  • No one is considered scientifically literate today who does not know what a Gaussian distribution is or the meaning and scope of the concept of entropy

  • More empirical evidence can be found to attest the numerical relationships between spatial entropy and fractal dimension

  • The similarities and differences between spatial entropy and fractal dimension of urban form can be partially revealed by box-counting method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

No one is considered scientifically literate today who does not know what a Gaussian distribution is or the meaning and scope of the concept of entropy. Entropy has been playing an important role for a long time in both spatial measurements and mathematical modeling of urban studies. When mathematical methods were introduced into geography from 1950s to 1970s, the ideas from system theory were introduced into geographical research. The concepts of entropy entered geographical analysis [1], and the notion of spatial entropy came into being [2]. Entropy as a measurement can be used to make spatial analysis for urban and regional systems [2,3,4,5]; on the other, Entropy 2017, 19, 600; doi:10.3390/e19110600 www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call