Abstract
ABSTRACT Research reveals that while uncontaminated eyewitness recall can be reliable, delayed trials make memory contamination inevitable. This study assessed the authenticity of eyewitness recall using neuro signature profiling. It examined the effects of negative feedback and leading questions on Experiential Knowledge (EK). Sixty participants with matched cognitive flexibility and response inhibition underwent two BEOS profiling sessions, fifteen days apart, after a real-life simulation. The findings showed no discernible change in EK for any of the three groups between the pre-and post-test conditions. Thus, affirming Neuro Signature Profiling as an effective technique for determining the veracity of eyewitness recall.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
