Abstract

This is an exploratory paper of the ethical implications for genomic research and mental illness with specific reference to Singapore. Singapore has a unique context due to its social and political systems, and although it is a relatively small country, its population is religiously and culturally diverse. The issues that we identify here, therefore, will offer new perspectives and will also shed light on the existing literature on psychiatric genomics in society. We contextualise issues such as risk and stigma in the identification and diagnosis of psychosis in the way they relate to Singaporean society, and use a current study (LYRIKS) as a case example.Genomic research has the potential to change significantly he practice of clinical medicine if, as expected, fast and inexpensive sequencing becomes a reality. It will likely also change how society thinks and acts in respect to multi-factorial diseases, conditions, traits, and syndromes that have a genetic component. Genomic research already raises a number of ethical concerns relating to the privacy of individuals, including the disclosure of research results and incidental findings, surreptitious tests, third party access to data, and the re-emergence of genetic determinism. These issues are potentially exacerbated when genomics - the study of whole genomes to understand complex illness and behavioural traits - is applied to psychiatric research, because of the stigma that is often attached to mental illness. In this paper, we discuss some of the issues that have arisen in the context of a study in Singapore that is currently investigating the genomics and biomarkers of psychosis. We argue that although a genomic study rarely creates data that is directly useful to the participant, it can have incidental benefits to the individual who is identified during the study as being at high risk of developing psychosis and its related states. Understanding these potential benefits requires us to examine the implications that this type of research may have on public understandings of genomic data and risk.

Highlights

  • There is a growing research literature supporting a clinical model for earlyintervention treatment of those who, through a combination of modalities, might strongly be expected to develop clinical psychosis.[2,3] This ‘ultra high risk’ (UHR) state is often indicated by a prodromal phase before psychotic breakthrough, and insights into behavioural changes and biomarkers have enabled timely treatment with more favorable clinical outcomes

  • We have explored the understanding of risk associated with genomic research and the possibility of identifying individuals who are at UHR of developing psychosis

  • We contextualised such research by referring to a current study in Singapore and developed a perspective that the nature of risk involved with genomic research and testing may be constructed from social and cultural processes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a growing research literature supporting a clinical model for earlyintervention treatment of those who, through a combination of modalities, might strongly be expected to develop clinical psychosis.[2,3] This ‘ultra high risk’ (UHR) state is often indicated by a prodromal phase before psychotic breakthrough, and insights into behavioural changes and biomarkers have enabled timely treatment with more favorable clinical outcomes. By focusing on the psychopathology and patho-physiology of ‘at-risk’ states of psychosis, the research may have implications for the timing at which the research participant seeks medical advice, his or her own recognition of symptoms, and his or her awareness of the significance of a history of familial diagnoses These will be affected by the public’s understanding of risk and mental illness (here referring to, but without distinguishing between: the population of Singapore, its cultural enclaves, discrete communities, and the participant’s family) because such relationships will shape and influence the context of the participant’s experiences. Our analysis will provide an ethical point of view in respect to the conduct of genomic research in mental health

Background
The Individual’s Perception of Risk
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.