Abstract
Abstract This article discusses four ways of understanding the concept of humor: 1) in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions, as 2) a cluster concept, 3) an interpretive concept, and 4) a dual character concept. We peruse both historical and contemporary research on humor, but instead of asking “What is humor?,” we draw conclusions regarding what humor research tells us of the ways to conceptualize humor. The main merits and shortcomings of different approaches are explicated. We suggest that the increased awareness of conceptual options will help the field of humor research to construct ever better theories on the elusive subject matter.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Humor Research
Cluster Concept
Contemporary Research
Sufficient Conditions
Dual Concept
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedSimilar Papers
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Aug 30, 2010
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Jan 1, 2001
Journal of Adolescent Health
May 1, 2006
Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft
Feb 1, 2009
Asian Journal of Social Science Studies
Mar 28, 2022
The British Journal of Aesthetics
Mar 10, 2010
Medical Education
Jan 1, 2010
Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education
Apr 1, 2019
Participatory Educational Research
May 1, 2022
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
Dec 1, 2017
Issues in Humour Cognition
May 31, 2018
Innovation Policy and the Economy
Jan 1, 2018
Communication Theory
Aug 1, 2000
The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook
The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook
Sep 18, 2023
The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook
Sep 18, 2023
The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook
Sep 18, 2023
The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook
Sep 18, 2023
The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook
Sep 18, 2023
The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook
Sep 18, 2023
The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook
Sep 18, 2023
The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook
Sep 18, 2023
The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook
Sep 18, 2023