Abstract
Visual stimuli can be kept from awareness using various methods. The extent of processing that a given stimulus receives in the absence of awareness is typically used to make claims about the role of consciousness more generally. The neural processing elicited by a stimulus, however, may also depend on the method used to keep it from awareness, and not only on whether the stimulus reaches awareness. Here we report that the method used to render an image invisible has a dramatic effect on how category information about the unseen stimulus is encoded across the human brain. We collected fMRI data while subjects viewed images of faces and tools, that were rendered invisible using either continuous flash suppression (CFS) or chromatic flicker fusion (CFF). In a third condition, we presented the same images under normal fully visible viewing conditions. We found that category information about visible images could be extracted from patterns of fMRI responses throughout areas of neocortex known to be involved in face or tool processing. However, category information about stimuli kept from awareness using CFS could be recovered exclusively within occipital cortex, whereas information about stimuli kept from awareness using CFF was also decodable within temporal and frontal regions. We conclude that unconsciously presented objects are processed differently depending on how they are rendered subjectively invisible. Caution should therefore be used in making generalizations on the basis of any one method about the neural basis of consciousness or the extent of information processing without consciousness.
Highlights
Blindsight (Weiskrantz, 1990) reveals that some patients who lack conscious vision can have residual unconscious processing
BEHAVIORAL RESULTS Behavioral data collected during scanning show that subjects were at chance when guessing stimulus category during both invisible conditions and at ceiling (99.4%, p < 0.0001, one-sided t-test against chance accuracy) during the visible condition
Subjects rarely reported seeing the faces or tools during either invisible condition (3.1% of trials for continuous flash suppression (CFS) and 4.3% of trials for chromatic flicker fusion (CFF) across all subjects) and almost always saw stimuli presented during the visible condition (96.2% of trials)
Summary
Blindsight (Weiskrantz, 1990) reveals that some patients who lack conscious vision can have residual unconscious processing. Forward and backward masking allow a stimulus to be rendered subjectively invisible by briefly presenting other highly salient stimuli just before or after the to-be-masked stimulus. This method is very effective at rendering a stimulus invisible, the stimulus of interest can be presented for only very brief (
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have