Abstract

Abstract. During the last decade the opportunity and usefulness of using remote-sensing data in hydrology, hydrometeorology and geomorphology has become even more evident and clear. Satellite-based products often allow for the advantage of observing hydrologic variables in a distributed way, offering a different view with respect to traditional observations that can help with understanding and modeling the hydrological cycle. Moreover, remote-sensing data are fundamental in scarce data environments. The use of satellite-derived digital elevation models (DEMs), which are now globally available at 30 m resolution (e.g., from Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission, SRTM), have become standard practice in hydrologic model implementation, but other types of satellite-derived data are still underutilized. As a consequence there is the need for developing and testing techniques that allow the opportunities given by remote-sensing data to be exploited, parameterizing hydrological models and improving their calibration. In this work, Meteosat Second Generation land-surface temperature (LST) estimates and surface soil moisture (SSM), available from European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) H-SAF, are used together with streamflow observations (S. N.) to calibrate the Continuum hydrological model that computes such state variables in a prognostic mode. The first part of the work aims at proving that satellite observations can be exploited to reduce uncertainties in parameter calibration by reducing the parameter equifinality that can become an issue in forecast mode. In the second part, four parameter estimation strategies are implemented and tested in a comparative mode: (i) a multi-objective approach that includes both satellite and ground observations which is an attempt to use different sources of data to add constraints to the parameters; (ii and iii) two approaches solely based on remotely sensed data that reproduce the case of a scarce data environment where streamflow observation are not available; (iv) a standard calibration based on streamflow observations used as a benchmark for the others. Two Italian catchments are used as a test bed to verify the model capability in reproducing long-term (multi-year) simulations. The results of the analysis evidence that, as a result of the model structure and the nature itself of the catchment hydrologic processes, some model parameters are only weakly dependent on discharge observations, and prove the usefulness of using data from both ground stations and satellites to additionally constrain the parameters in the calibration process and reduce the number of equifinal solutions.

Highlights

  • The estimation of parameters in hydrological models is still a challenge in hydrology

  • Each score based on streamflow data, and presented in Sect. 2.3.1, can be influenced differently by different flow regimes and hydrograph characteristics; for each simulation the NS was plotted against the other scores (Zappa et al, 2011); the results are reported in Fig. 4 and the graphs show that in all cases there are sets of behavioral parameters (Beven and Binley, 1992) that give good values of the scores, indicating good simulation of the observed streamflow series

  • This paper shows that satellite data are useful in reducing the uncertainty of the parameterization of a distributed hydrological model and that they can be used in calibration strategy to improve model representation of hydrological processes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The estimation of parameters in hydrological models is still a challenge in hydrology. Much work has been devoted to determining the best calibration strategy (Yapo et al, 1998; Madesen, 2000; Kim et al, 2007; Singh and Bardossy, 2012; Xu et al, 2013) with some trying to evaluate the uncertainties associated with the parameter estimation process (Beven and Binley, 1992; Vrugt et al, 2003; Carpenter and Georgakakos, 2006; Zappa et al, 2011) This issue has become even more complex with the increasing use of continuous and distributed hydrological models. Silvestro et al.: Uncertainty reduction and parameter estimation of a distributed hydrological model formance in the calibration phase, but this can lead to a large number of equifinal parameter sets (Beven and Binley, 1992) sometimes hampering the forecast ability of the models

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call