Abstract

Ecological risk assessments are used for decision making regarding releasing new products to market as well as remedial action required to address contamination at legacy sites. Uncertainty analysis is considered a key part of the process (USEPA 1997) but assessments seldom address uncertainty quantitatively. Key sources of uncertainty include: Sampling and analytical variability (soil/ sediment matrix, lab error), Choice of “Indicator” Species as Target Receptors for Different Exposure Pathways, Sample size. Bioaccumulation and Food Chain Modeling involve assumptions and uncertainty including: Linear assumption of bioaccumulation and selection of bioaccumulation factors; Other model inputs such as: Home range size, Dietary percentages, Body Weights, Ingestion Rate; Literature data on effects, Use of No Observed Adverse Effects Level (NOAEL) or Lowest Observed Adverse Effects Level (LOAEL) as a decision point. Toxicity testing where employed brings its own set of assumptions and interpretation that are subject to uncertainty. These include: Use of single organism, Correlation (or lack thereof) with Contaminants of Concern, Contaminant mixtures, and Reference area selection. Keywords: Ecotoxicology, Risk Assessment, Ecology

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.