Uncertainties in estimating the effect of climate change on 100-year return value for significant wave height

This work presents updated hydrologic projections for the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB) using downscaled (approximately 12 km) General Circulation Model (GCM) output from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project – Phase 5 (CMIP5) with a comparison to CMIP3 GCMs. We use the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model to simulate the impacts of end-of-century climate change on the UCRB using 21 CMIP5 and 18 CMIP3 GCMs, collected into one CMIP5 ensemble and one CMIP3 ensemble, respectively. Previous CMIP3 studies have identified a drier climate for the UCRB because of projected increases in temperature and decreases/little change in precipitation. Hydrologic simulations from CMIP5 inputs suggest wetter conditions than simulations based on CMIP3 inputs, yet drier conditions than the historical climate. Both ensembles lead to timing shifts in peak streamflow during the snowmelt season from changes in snowmelt, but the higher CMIP5 projected precipitation leads to, on average, peak streamflows 200–300 m3 s−1 larger (25–40% difference) than the CMIP3 projections. This difference is largely generated in the northern UCRB region, where CMIP5 simulations project much more significant increases in streamflow than CMIP3. This increase is largely due to an overall larger rise in precipitation in the CMIP5 ensemble (57% of the total UCRB area) compared to the CMIP3 ensemble (5%). Even with projected increases in precipitation, snowmelt is projected to decrease dramatically throughout the UCRB for both ensembles. The increases in precipitation and decreases in snowmelt leads to significant differences in hydrologic flux components between the CMIP3 and CMIP5 ensembles, such as end-of-century rises in soil water content and evapotranspiration in the CMIP5 ensemble compared to the CMIP3 ensemble. The difference between the dry CMIP3 and the somewhat wetter CMIP5 projections may be critical for water management in the already over-allocated UCRB.

The North Atlantic eddy-driven jet is a dominant feature of extratropical climate and its variability is associated with the large-scale changes in the surface climate of midlatitudes. Variability of this jet is analysed in a set of General Circulation Models (GCMs) from the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project phase-5 (CMIP5) over the North Atlantic region. The CMIP5 simulations for the 20th century climate (Historical) are compared with the ERA40 reanalysis data. The jet latitude index, wind speed and jet persistence are analysed in order to evaluate 11 CMIP5 GCMs and to compare them with those from CMIP3 integrations. The phase of mean seasonal cycle of jet latitude and wind speed from historical runs of CMIP5 GCMs are comparable to ERA40. The wind speed mean seasonal cycle by CMIP5 GCMs is overestimated in winter months. A positive (negative) jet latitude anomaly in historical simulations relative to ERA40 is observed in summer (winter). The ensemble mean of jet latitude biases in historical simulations of CMIP3 and CMIP5 with respect to ERA40 are -2.43^circ and -1.79^circ respectively. Thus indicating improvements in CMIP5 in comparison to the CMIP3 GCMs. The comparison of historical and future simulations of CMIP5 under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 for the period 2076–2099, shows positive anomalies in the jet latitude implying a poleward shifted jet. The results from the analysed models offer no specific improvements in simulating the trimodality of the eddy-driven jet.

Assessing the performance of General Circulation Models (GCMs) in simulating historical regional precipitation is essential for climate assessments. This study analysed 18 GCMs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) and 27 GCMs from Phase 6 (CMIP6) for the Florida Peninsula. Naïve combinations formed the CMIP5‐Ensemble and CMIP6‐Ensemble. The reference dataset consisted of global gridded precipitation data from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. GCM‐simulated precipitation data were compared to the reference dataset across multiple time scales between 1951 and 2005. Most CMIP5 and CMIP6 GCMs exhibited a negative bias at the daily time scale, with an absolute value ranging between 0 and 2 mm day−1 at the median level, except for INM‐CM4 and MRI‐CGCM3 (CMIP5) and CNRM‐ESM2‐1 (CMIP6). Two performance metrics, that is, Pearson correlation and mean absolute error (MAE), were used to evaluate the GCMs. A correlation value above 0.3 is statistically significant at the significance level (α = 0.05). For the Pearson correlation between simulated and observed monthly precipitation, only 15% of CMIP5 GCMs (3 out of 19) had a median value above 0.3, whilst this increased to approximately 39% (11 out of 28) for CMIP6 GCMs. For monthly climatological precipitation, only 21% (4 out of 21) of GCMs in CMIP5 showed a correlation with a median value of 0.8 or higher. This percentage rose to 50% (14 out of 28) for CMIP6. A notable difference was observed in the MAE between CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate models. Lastly, GCM raw outputs were evaluated based on rainy season characteristics (onset, demise and duration). Significant improvements from the CMIP5 to the CMIP6 models were observed in capturing the rainy season in the Florida Peninsula. This study thoroughly compares CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate models in simulating historical precipitation at various time scales for the study region. Although the results are specific to the study area, the methods can be applied more broadly.

The impact and uncertainty of climate change on stream flow of the Bilate River Watershed was assessed. Ensemble of 20 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) general circulation models (GCMs) under two Representative Concentration Pathways and six GCM structures were selected to form 24 future climate scenarios for the watershed. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was selected to simulate stream flow of the watershed. The respective statistical results of the coefficient of determination (R2), Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE) and percent bias (PB) are 0.79, 0.78 and 0.56 for calibration period and 0.64, 0.60 and -21.7 for validation period which show that the model predicted the stream flow reasonably. The annual stream flow increased progressively throughout the century for all time periods. The increases under RCP 8.5 scenario are the larger compared to RCP 4.5 scenarios, approximately 42.42% during the 2080s period. The six GCMs selected to see the uncertainties related to GCMs suggest that the river flow will change by small amounts of -6.18 to 7.83% change compared with the baseline. The simulated runoff depended on the projected amount of rainfall embedded in the GCM structures selected to simulate the future climate and less dependent on the local temperature increment. Key words: Climate change, Bilate River watershed, stream flow, soil and water assessment tool (SWAT), uncertainty.

This chapter focused on Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 5 (CMIP5), and discussed various results. Starting from outlining very basic equations of global climate models (GCMs) as used in CMIP5 models, it described briefly about the aim and objective of the CMIP5 project. It is followed by discussion on various experiments, historical and RCP (Representative Concentration Pathway) situation. The global temperature generated using CMIP5 models was compared with observation. Indian Summer Monsoon and El Nino Southern Oscillation in CMIP5 models were analysed in the historical and RCP situation, and few areas of agreement and disagreement were discussed. Few results from the atmospheric version of CMIP5 models (AMIP5) and Phase 3 of CMIP5 experiments (CMIP3) were also presented. Some stratospheric features are shown well captured by models.

Global warming has considerably challenged the natural environment and livelihood conditions. Understanding potential future changes in critical climatic variables, such as temperature and precipitation, is important for regional agricultural and water resource management. This study proposes a new approach to the application of the Long Ashton Research Station Weather Generator (LARS-WG) in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) emission scenarios and aims to test its applicability in cold areas and to evaluate the response of temperature and precipitation, in amount and form, under future warmer climate trends. Three stations in northeastern China are set as case sites, and 50 years of daily weather observations are used for model calibration and validation. Future synthetic time-series of daily precipitation and daily maximum and minimum temperatures is generated by the calibrated LARS-WG based on three Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios with various radiative forcing levels of 14 general circulation models (GCMs) outputs for the periods 2041–2060 (2050s) and 2061–2080 (2070s). The results show that the CMIP5 scenarios can be successfully used in a LARS-WG model and that the model performs well in cold weather conditions to repeat the current status of the case sites; the model is able to provide downscaling analysis for future daily weather generation via updating calibrated model parameters based on various GCM outputs. A generally warming and wetting conversion would last into the future for the study sites, but there is great inconsistency among different GCMs. An ensemble approach is adopted with mean values of multi-GCMs to avoid the uncertainty associated with using a single GCM, based on which the changes in the form of precipitation are further estimated. As a result of the decrease in freezing conditions, although annual precipitation will continue to increase in the future, there will be relatively less annual snowfall, which will be primarily focused in deep winter. Such changes in snow cover conditions will potentially disturb the original rules of local overwintering agriculture. In addition, more intense and earlier snowmelt discharge and more rainfall in summer will latently impact the watershed hydrologic process. The influences of climate change are significant, and related projects for agricultural and water resource management should be of great concern in local decision-making.

Investigation of the role of multiple general circulation model (GCM) ensembles in obtaining comprehensive knowledge of hydrological responses across the Yellow River Basin (YRB), China, is still of substantial importance. This study evaluates the performance of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models in simulating the hydrological regime in the YRB and compares the results with those from CMIP 5 (CMIP5). The comparison is performed between 21 GCMs from CMIP6 under three Shared Socioeconomic Pathway scenarios and 18 GCMs from CMIP5 under three Representative Concentration Pathway scenarios. Raw CMIP outputs are first corrected and downscaled by the Bias Correction and Spatial Disaggregation methods, and the bias-corrected GCM outputs are then employed to drive the Soil and Water Assessment Tool hydrological model and project streamflow. After correction and downscaling, areal averages for future changes (relative to 1971–2000) of temperature and precipitation are found larger in CMIP6 than in CMIP5. The emblematic annual mean temperature of CMIP6 increases by 1.64–2.20 and 2.31–5.29 °C for the future period of 2026–2055 and 2066–2095, while the counterpart of CMIP5 is 1.92–2.39 and 1.68–4.76 °C, respectively. In terms of precipitation, for CMIP6, it increases by 3.45–4.70 and 6.77–15.40%, and for CMIP5 by 2.58–2.96 and 3.83–9.95%. It is further concluded that: (1) future streamflow will probably decrease less under CMIP6 than that under CMIP5 in most cases, and climate changes of this kind will affect regional water supply and security in the YRB; (2) uncertainty in the projected streamflow is dominated by GCMs uncertainty with the contribution rate of >75%; (3) the streamflow is more sensitive to precipitation changes in comparison with temperature changes in the near future. In contrast, streamflow reduction is more attributed to an increase in temperature with a contribution rate of almost >60% than in precipitation in the far future.

Global and regional climate change assessments rely heavily on the general circulation model (GCM) outputs such as provided by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5). Here we evaluate the ability of 25 CMIP5 GCMs to simulate historical precipitation and temperature over central Africa and assess their future projections in the context of historical performance and intermodel and future emission scenario uncertainties. We then apply a statistical bias correction technique to the monthly climate fields and develop monthly downscaled fields for the period of 1948–2099. The bias‐corrected and downscaled data set is constructed by combining a suite of global observation and reanalysis‐based data sets, with the monthly GCM outputs for the 20th century, and 21st century projections for the medium mitigation (representative concentration pathway (RCP)45) and high emission (RCP85) scenarios. Overall, the CMIP5 models simulate temperature better than precipitation, but substantial spatial heterogeneity exists. Many models show limited skill in simulating the seasonality, spatial patterns, and magnitude of precipitation. Temperature projections by the end of the 21st century (2070–2099) show a robust warming between 2 and 4°C across models, whereas precipitation projections vary across models in the sign and magnitude of change (−9% to 27%). Projected increase in precipitation for a subset of models (single model ensemble (SME)) identified based on performance metrics and causal mechanisms are slightly higher compared to the full multimodel ensemble (MME) mean; however, temperature projections are similar between the two ensemble means. For the near‐term (2021–2050), neither the historical performance nor choice of models is related to the precipitation projections, indicating that natural variability dominated any signal. With fewer models, the “blind” MME approach will have larger uncertainties in future precipitation projections compared to projections by the SME models. We propose the latter a better approach in regions that lack quality climate observations. Our analyses also show that the choice of model and emission scenario dominate the uncertainty in precipitation projections, whereas the emission scenario dominates the temperature projections. Although our analyses are done for central Africa, the final Bias‐Corrected Spatially Downscaled data set is available for global land areas. The framework for climate change assessment and the data will be useful for a variety of climate assessment, impact, and adaptation studies.

Ensembles of climate change projections created by general circulation models (GCMs) with high resolution are increasingly needed to develop adaptation strategies for regional climate change. The Meteorological Research Institute atmospheric GCM version 3.2 (MRI-AGCM3.2), which is listed in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5), has been typically run with resolutions of 60 km and 20 km. Ensembles of MRI-AGCM3.2 consist of members with multiple cumulus convection schemes and different patterns of future sea surface temperature, and are utilized together with their downscaled data; however, the limited size of the high-resolution ensemble may lead to undesirable biases and uncertainty in future climate projections that will limit its appropriateness and effectiveness for studies on climate change and impact assessments. In this study, to develop a comprehensive understanding of the regional precipitation simulated with MRI-AGCM3.2, we investigate how well MRI-AGCM3.2 simulates the present-day regional precipitation around the globe and compare the uncertainty in future precipitation changes and the change projection itself between MRI-AGCM3.2 and the CMIP5 multiple atmosphere–ocean coupled GCM (AOGCM) ensemble. MRI-AGCM3.2 reduces the bias of the regional mean precipitation obtained with the high-performing CMIP5 models, with a reduction of approximately 20% in the bias over the Tibetan Plateau through East Asia and Australia. When 26 global land regions are considered, MRI-AGCM3.2 simulates the spatial pattern and the regional mean realistically in more regions than the individual CMIP5 models. As for the future projections, in 20 of the 26 regions, the sign of annual precipitation change is identical between the 50th percentiles of the MRI-AGCM3.2 ensemble and the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. In the other six regions around the tropical South Pacific, the differences in modeling with and without atmosphere–ocean coupling may affect the projections. The uncertainty in future changes in annual precipitation from MRI-AGCM3.2 partially overlaps the maximum–minimum uncertainty range from the full ensemble of the CMIP5 models in all regions. Moreover, on average over individual regions, the projections from MRI-AGCM3.2 spread over roughly 0.8 of the uncertainty range from the high-performing CMIP5 models compared to 0.4 of the range of the full ensemble.

Precipitation variability has great economic, social, and environmental impacts across the globe, and in particular in China. This paper evaluates the historical precipitation variability based on 20 general circulation models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) archive over the 20th century relative to two observational data sets and quantifies CMIP5 improvements over CMIP3. Multimodel ensemble means and individual models are assessed. Three future emission scenarios are used (representative concentration pathways (RCP) 8.5, RCP 4.5, and RCP 2.6), and 21st century CMIP5 estimates are put into context based on the 20th century biases. We find that CMIP5 models can reproduce the spatial pattern of precipitation over China during the 20th century, which represents an improvement over CMIP3. However, the models overestimate the magnitude of seasonal and annual precipitation in most regions of China, especially along the eastern edge of the Tibetan Plateau, and underestimate summer precipitation over southeastern China. For China as a whole, CMIP5's overestimation of annual precipitation is greater than CMIP3, which can be traced back to a greater underestimation of summer precipitation in CMIP3. There is a large spread among individual models, with the greatest uncertainties in simulating summer precipitation. Trends and correlations also suggest a better agreement of CMIP5 with observations than CMIP3. Throughout the 20th century, both the observations and models show an increasing trend in precipitation over parts of northwestern China and a decreasing trend over the Tibetan Plateau. There is poor agreement in precipitation trends over the southeast and northeast regions. In general, multimodel means cannot capture the amplitude of observed multidecadal precipitation variability. In the 21st century, precipitation is generally projected to increase across all of China under all three scenarios. RCP 8.5 exhibits the largest significant trend at a rate of +1.5 mm/yr, corresponding to 16% precipitation increase by the end of the century. The RCP 2.6 scenario shows the smallest increases, at +0.5 mm/yr (6%) by 2100. The greatest increases are projected to occur over the Tibetan Plateau and eastern China in summer, suggesting an altered monsoonal circulation in the future. However, due to the uncertainties in CMIP5, future precipitation projections should be interpreted with caution.

Selection of a suitable general circulation model (GCM) ensemble is crucial for effective water resource management and reliable climate studies in developing countries with constraint in human and computational resources. A careful selection of a GCM subset by excluding those with limited similarity to the observed climate from the existing pool of GCMs developed by different modeling centers at various resolutions can ease the task and minimize uncertainties. In this study, a feature selection method known as symmetrical uncertainty (SU) was employed to assess the performance of 26 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) GCM outputs under Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5. The selection was made according to their capability to simulate observed daily precipitation (prcp), maximum and minimum temperature (Tmax and Tmin) over the historical period 1980–2005 in the Niger Delta region, which is highly vulnerable to extreme climate events. The ensemble of the four top-ranked GCMs, namely ACCESS1.3, MIROC-ESM, MIROC-ESM-CHM, and NorESM1-M, were selected for the spatio-temporal projection of prcp, Tmax, and Tmin over the study area. Results from the chosen ensemble predicted an increase in the mean annual prcp between the range of 0.26% to 3.57% under RCP4.5, and 0.7% to 4.94% under RCP 8.5 by the end of the century when compared to the base period. The study also revealed an increase in Tmax in the range of 0 to 0.4 °C under RCP4.5 and 1.25–1.79 °C under RCP8.5 during the periods 2070–2099. Tmin also revealed a significant increase of 0 to 0.52 °C under RCP4.5 and between 1.38–2.02 °C under RCP8.5, which shows that extreme events might threaten the Niger Delta due to climate change. Water resource managers in the region can use these findings for effective water resource planning, management, and adaptation measures.

The double‐intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) bias is one of the most outstanding errors in all previous generations of climate models. Here, the annual double‐ITCZ bias and the associated precipitation bias in the latest climate models for Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) Phase 6 (CMIP6) are examined in comparison to their previous generations (CMIP Phase 3 [CMIP3] and CMIP Phase 5 [CMIP5]). All three generations of CMIP models share similar systematic annual multi‐model ensemble mean precipitation errors in the tropics. The notorious double‐ITCZ bias and its big inter‐model spread persist in CMIP3, CMIP5, and CMIP6 models. Based on several tropical precipitation bias indices, the double‐ITCZ bias is slightly reduced from CMIP3 or CMIP5 to CMIP6. In addition, the annual equatorial Pacific cold tongue persists in all three generations of CMIP models, but its inter‐model spread is reduced from CMIP3 to CMIP5 and from CMIP5 to CMIP6.

Knowledge about future global and regional warming is essential for effective adaptation planning and our current temperature projections are based on the output of global climate models (GCMs). Although GCMs agree on the direction of change, there are still significant discrepancies in the magnitude of the projected response1.  Here we develop a novel method2,3 for constraining uncertainty in future regional temperature projections based on the predictions of an observationally trained machine learning algorithm, Ridge-ERA5. Ridge-ERA5 - a Ridge regression model4- learns coefficients to represent observed relationships between daily temperature anomalies and a selection of thermodynamic and dynamical variables in the ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA) 5 dataset5. Climate-invariance of the Ridge relationships is demonstrated in a perfect model framework: we train a set of 23 Ridge-CMIP models on historical data of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) phase 66 and evaluate their predictions using future scenario data from the most extreme future emissions pathway, SSP 5-8.5.   Combining the historically constrained Ridge-ERA5 coefficients with normalised inputs from CMIP6 future climate change simulations forms the basis of a new methodology to derive observational constraints on regional climate change. For daily, regional (2°x2°), summer temperatures across the Northern Hemisphere, the Ridge-ERA5 observations-based constraint implies, for example, that a group of higher sensitivity CMIP6 models is inconsistent with observational evidence (including in Eastern, West & Central, and Northern Europe) potentially suggesting that the sensitivity of these models is indeed too high7,8. A key advantage of our new method is the ability to constrain regional projections at very high – daily – temporal resolution which includes extreme events such as heatwaves.    1) Brient, F. (2019) Reducing Uncertainties in Climate Projections with Emergent Constraints: Concepts, Examples and Prospects. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2020 37:1, 37(1), pp. 1–15.  2) Ceppi, P. and Nowack, P. (2021) Observational evidence that cloud feedback amplifies global warming. PNAS, 118(30).  3) Nowack, P. et al. An observational constraint on the uncertainty in stratospheric water vapour projections. (in review)  4) Hoerl, A. E. and Kennard, R. W. (1970) Ridge Regression: Applications to Nonorthogonal Problems. Technometrics, 12(1), pp. 69–82.   5) Hersbach, H. et al. (2020) The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146(730), pp. 1999–2049.   6) Eyring, V. et al. (2016) Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development, 9(5), pp. 1937–1958.   7) Zelinka, M. D. et al. (2020) Causes of Higher Climate Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(1).  8) Zhu, J., Poulsen, C. J. and Otto-Bliesner, B. L. (2020) High climate sensitivity in CMIP6 model not supported by paleoclimate. Nature Climate Change 2020 10:5, 10(5), pp. 378–379. 

A study has been conducted to evaluate the changes in temperature of Borneo Island for different representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios through statistical downscaling of an ensemble of general circulation models (GCMs) selected using entropy-based methods. A combination of past-performance and envelope approaches was used for the selection of GCM ensemble from a pool of 20 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) GCMs. Ranking of the GCMs was done separately at each grid point by using three entropy-based feature selection methods. Climate Research Unit (CRU) gridded temperature data was used as dependent variable and the simulated temperature of different GCMs for the period 1961–2005 was used as independent variable for the selection of GCMs. The scores obtained by the GCMs at different CRU grids were aggregated using compromise programming method and then ranked for entire Borneo Island using group decision-making method. Linear scaling method was applied to remove the biases in GCMs, followed by random forest (RF)–based regression method to generate multi-model ensemble projections. The results revealed that FIO-ESM, MRI-CGCM3, GFDL-CM3, and IPSL-CM5A-MR are the most suitable GCMs for the projection of temperature in the study area. The projection of temperature using the selected GCMs indicated increase in temperature in the Borneo Island, particularly in the southwest regions. The minimum temperature was projected to increase more (3.3 to 4.7 °C) compared with maximum temperature (3.0 to 4.6 °C) and thus, the diurnal temperature range (DTR) was projected to decrease gradually until the end of the twenty-first century. Increase in average and maximum temperatures was projected more during the southwest (SW) monsoon compared with the northeast (NE) monsoon. The study indicated that large increase in temperature and decrease in DTR would have significant impact on ecology and bio-environment of the island which have one of the dense ecological diversities in the world.

Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) was calibrated and evaluated to simulate maize (zea mays L.) var. BH660 under current and future climate in Ethiopia under moist mid-highlands of Ethiopia around Ambo Zuria district. Simulations for both current and future periods were run assuming present technology, current varieties and current agronomy packages to investigate rain-fed Maize yield responses. Simulations was made using downscaled weather data from five General Circulation Models (GCMs) under the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) and two Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP 4.5 and 8.5) by mid-century show a mixture of increase and decrease in median Maize yields. Five GCMs project yields to increase by 5% - 23.0% and one GCM show a decrease by 2% - 9%. Model simulations under the remaining three GCMs give contrasting results of increase and decrease.