Abstract
.Significance: An accurate, automated, and unbiased cell counting procedure is needed for tissue selection for corneal transplantation.Aim: To improve accuracy and reduce bias in endothelial cell density (ECD) quantification by combining Gabor-domain optical coherence microscopy (GDOCM) for three-dimensional, wide field-of-view () corneal imaging and machine learning for automatic delineation of endothelial cell boundaries.Approach: Human corneas stored in viewing chambers were imaged over a wide field-of-view with GDOCM without contacting the specimens. Numerical methods were applied to compensate for the natural curvature of the cornea and produce an image of the flattened endothelium. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to automatically delineate the cell boundaries using 180 manually annotated images from six corneas. Ten additional corneas were imaged with GDOCM and compared with specular microscopy (SM) to determine performance of the combined GDOCM and CNN to achieve automated endothelial counts relative to current procedural standards.Results: Cells could be imaged over a larger area with GDOCM than SM, and more cells could be delineated via automatic cell segmentation than via manual methods. ECD obtained from automatic cell segmentation of GDOCM images yielded a correlation of 0.94 () with the manual segmentation on the same images, and correlation of 0.91 () with the corresponding manually counted SM results.Conclusions: Automated endothelial cell counting on GDOCM images with large field of view eliminates selection bias and reduces sampling error, which both affect the gold standard of manual counting on SM images.
Highlights
Endothelial cells show poor regenerative capacity in vivo and are critical for preserving corneal transparency vis-a-vis their fluid pumping mechanism that maintains appropriate hydration status and clarity of the stroma
Automated endothelial cell counting on Gabor-domain optical coherence microscopy (GDOCM) images with large field of view eliminates selection bias and reduces sampling error, which both affect the gold standard of manual counting on specular microscopy (SM) images
While the 1D approach can result in artifacts [as shown in Fig. 7(a)] due to mismatch between adjacent points, the 3D approach results in an artifact-free en face view of the endothelium [see Fig. 7(b)]
Summary
Endothelial cells show poor regenerative capacity in vivo and are critical for preserving corneal transparency vis-a-vis their fluid pumping mechanism that maintains appropriate hydration status and clarity of the stroma. The Cornea Donor Study Group evaluated 663 SM images and compared the results obtained by individual eye banks and by the Cornea Reading Center; only 65% of the images yielded a difference in cell count under 10%.7. Factors such as image quality, death to preservation time, and presence of epithelial defects or of Descemet’s membrane folds, as well as the choice of method used for extrapolating the ECD, all impact the variability in ECD between eye banks The Cornea Donor Study Group evaluated 663 SM images and compared the results obtained by individual eye banks and by the Cornea Reading Center; only 65% of the images yielded a difference in cell count under 10%.7 Factors such as image quality, death to preservation time, and presence of epithelial defects or of Descemet’s membrane folds, as well as the choice of method used for extrapolating the ECD, all impact the variability in ECD between eye banks
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have