Abstract
Semiquantitative and quantitative sonographic techniques have the potential for screening and surveillance of children at risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. To determine diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of hepatorenal index (HRI) for pediatric ultrasound-based liver fat quantification. In an institutional review board (IRB)-approved retrospective study (April 2014 to April 2023), children (< 18years) with clinically performed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for liver fat quantification were assessed. Inclusion criteria required availability of abdominal ultrasound within 3months of quantitative MRI. Three blinded readers subjectively assessed for sonographic hepatic steatosis and calculated HRI. MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was the reference standard. Interobserver agreement, correlation with PDFF, and optimal HRI (using ROC analysis) values were analyzed. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. A total of 41 patients (25 male) with median (interquartile range (IQR)) age of 13 (10-15) years were included. Median (IQR) MRI PDFF was 11.30% (2.70-17.95%). Hepatic steatosis distribution by MRI PDFF included grade 0 (34%), grade 1 (15%), grade 2 (22%), and grade 3 (29%) patients. Intraclass correlation coefficient for HRI among the three readers was 0.61 (95% CI 0.43-0.75) (p < 0.001). Moderate correlation was observed between manually estimated HRI and PDFF for each reader (r = 0.62, 0.67, and 0.67; p < 0.001). Optimal HRI cutoff was found to be 1.99 to diagnose hepatic steatosis (sensitivity 89%, specificity 93%). Median (IQR) HRI for each MRI grade of hepatic steatosis (0-4) was as follows: 1.2 (1.1-1.5), 2.6 (1.1-3.3), 3.6 (2.6-5.4), 5.6 (2.6-10.9), respectively (p < 0.001). Ultrasound-estimated HRI has moderate interobserver agreement and moderate correlation with MRI-derived PDFF. HRI of 1.99 maximizes accuracy for identifying pediatric liver fat.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
