Ultrasound Findings in Patients with Normal Nerve Conduction despite Clinical Signs and Symptoms Consistent with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Abstract

Confirmatory methods such as nerve conduction studies are often performed to support a clinical carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis and to rule out other upper extremity pathologies. Ultrasonography provides another diagnostic option, especially when nerve conduction studies are discordant with history and physical examination. The authors explored the correlation of ultrasound findings with clinical carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis in patients with normal nerve conduction study results. A database of 220 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome was analyzed retrospectively to reveal 24 patients (28 hands) with a clinical diagnosis and normal nerve conduction study results. Patient demographics and nerve conduction study and ultrasound findings were compared with those of a control group of patients without carpal tunnel syndrome (42 patients, 52 hands). Median nerve cross-sectional area was recorded; values of 10 mm 2 or greater were considered positive for carpal tunnel. Statistical and correlation analyses were performed between control and carpal tunnel groups comparing key measures of interest. Mean cross-sectional area was significantly increased in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome with normal nerve conduction study results compared with controls. The proportion of carpal tunnel-positive, nerve conduction study-negative patients with cross-sectional area measurements greater than 10 mm 2 was significantly greater than the proportion for control patients. Neither age nor body mass index correlated with cross-sectional area measurements. Nerve conduction study latencies and amplitudes did not correlate with ultrasound abnormalities. Patients diagnosed clinically with carpal tunnel syndrome with normal nerve conduction study results were found to have clinically significant median nerve cross-sectional area on ultrasound (10.1 ±2.1 mm 2 , p < 0.001). Cross-sectional area measurements on ultrasound did not correlate with nerve conduction study measures. These results suggest that ultrasound holds a unique diagnostic utility in the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome, especially when nerve conduction studies are negative. Diagnostic, II.