Abstract
Human exposure to aerosols has been associated with diseases and death, reducing the population's life expectancy up to a few years. Indoor particulate matter is predominant in determining human exposure to PM because people spend most of their time indoors.Ultrafine particles (UFP) impact the human body differently from PM2.5 or PM10 fractions. Therefore, scientists cannot apply the same approach to assess the effects of UFP and PM on human health.This work summarizes the health effects, generation, and measurement of ultrafine particles in indoor environments through a literature review. When indoor particle generation is low, particle concentration indoors depends strongly on outdoor aerosols, with an indoor-to-outdoor ratio below 1. In buildings with a high indoor particle generation, the average indoor-to-outdoor UFP concentration ratio can reach 14. Combustion, electric heating, and house cleaning are the main generators of UFP indoors.Current standards for UFP assessments do not provide a solid ground for accurate and reliable measurements. Moreover, the lowest detection limit of instruments used to measure UFP concentration can be significantly different while also showing poor repeatability even among instruments with the same manufacturer and model. Consequently, data supplied by studies on UFP health effects are insufficient and inconclusive.Using ultrafine portable monitors would allow determining properly human exposure to PM0.1, but such instruments are expensive for wide use. Since there is a good correlation between UFP and NOX data, low-cost NOX sensors are good candidates to create a dense and accurate monitoring network of UFP, including indoor environments.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call