Abstract
Whether boredom is a unitary construct or if multiple types of boredom exist is a long-standing debate. Recent research has established the existence of boredom types based on frequency observations of boredom by experience sampling. This work tries to expand our understanding of boredom and replicate these previous findings by applying intensity observations of cross-sectional type for four discrete learning activity emotions: boredom, anxiety, hopelessness, and enjoyment. Latent class analysis based on activity emotion scores from 9863 first-year students of a business and economics program results in seven profiles. Five of these profiles allow a linear ordering from low to high control and value scores (the direct antecedents of emotions), low to high positive, and high to low negative emotions. Two profiles differ from this pattern: one ‘high boredom’ profile and one ‘low boredom’ profile. We next compare antecedent relationships of activity emotions at three different levels: inter-individual, inter-class or between classes, and intra-class or within classes. Some of these relationships are invariant for the choice of level of analysis, such as hopelessness. Other relationships, such as boredom, are highly variant: within-class relationships differ from inter-individual relationships. Indeed, our results confirm that boredom is not a unitary construct. The types of boredom found and their implications for educational practice are discussed and shared in this article.
Highlights
Boredom among learning activity emotions ‘While studying this boring material, I spend my time thinking of how time stands still’... read this statement again and reflect upon it for a moment
Applying experience sampling to investigate the relationships of the frequency of boredom observations with perceptions of valence and arousal, Goetz et al (2014) decomposed the boredom construct in five types: four types of boredom that are linearly structured along the dimensions of low to high valence and arousal, and one type, apathetic boredom, that falls outside this linear relationship
We sought to answer the question: can boredom and other learning activity emotions be adequately explained by variable-oriented models such as the Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions (CVTAE) (Pekrun, 2006) suggest? Do different types of boredom exists, as suggested in Goetz et al, (2014, 2016)?
Summary
Boredom among learning activity emotions ‘While studying this boring material, I spend my time thinking of how time stands still’... read this statement again and reflect upon it for a moment. Boredom among learning activity emotions ‘While studying this boring material, I spend my time thinking of how time stands still’... Read this statement again and reflect upon it for a moment. How many times did you feel bored while performing an activity that was supposed to be useful and enriching for your studies or your daily work? At some point in life, anyone could relate to this. The opening statement only describes an item. Going back to the fact that at some point in life, everyone experiences boredom—be it more or less frequently and
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have