Abstract
BackgroundThere has been a shift towards greater use of neuraxial over general anaesthesia for patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. Furthermore, suggestions that peripheral nerve block may reduce adverse effects have recently been put forward. Although older studies showed a reduction in venous thromboembolism (VTE) with neuraxial compared with general anaesthesia, this difference has not been confirmed in studies using effective current thromboprophylaxis. We used a large data set to investigate the pattern of anaesthesia usage, and whether anaesthesia type affects efficacy and bleeding outcomes of thromboprophylaxis overall, within each treatment group, or for the novel oral anticoagulant dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin.MethodsThree previously reported trials compared 220 mg and 150 mg dabigatran etexilate once daily with enoxaparin after knee or hip arthroplasty. A pooled analysis was performed in patients receiving general or neuraxial anaesthesia, or the combination of either with peripheral nerve block (n = 8062). Outcome measures were major VTE plus VTE-related mortality, major bleeding and major plus clinically relevant bleeding events.ResultsGeneral, neuraxial and combination anaesthesia were used in 29%, 52% and 19% of patients, respectively. Differences in efficacy and safety between anaesthesia subgroups were small and not significant, except for a slightly higher rate of major VTE and VTE-related mortality with general versus neuraxial anaesthesia (odds ratio: 1.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.90; p = 0.035) in the overall population. There were no significant effects of anaesthesia type on efficacy or safety of dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin.ConclusionsAnaesthesia type did not greatly affect efficacy and safety outcomes in the pooled population of all three treatment groups. The efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate was comparable with enoxaparin, regardless of type of anaesthesia.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00168805, NCT00168818, NCT00152971.
Highlights
There has been a shift towards greater use of neuraxial over general anaesthesia for patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty
Patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty surgery are known to be at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) [1] and thromboprophylaxis is recommended [2]
Three pivotal Phase III clinical trials – RE-MODELTM, RE-NOVATEW and RE-MOBILIZEW – investigated the efficacy and safety of 220 mg and 150 mg dabigatran etexilate once daily compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin as thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty [5,6,7]
Summary
There has been a shift towards greater use of neuraxial over general anaesthesia for patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. Older studies showed a reduction in venous thromboembolism (VTE) with neuraxial compared with general anaesthesia, this difference has not been confirmed in studies using effective current thromboprophylaxis. Patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty surgery are known to be at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) [1] and thromboprophylaxis is recommended [2]. Three pivotal Phase III clinical trials – RE-MODELTM, RE-NOVATEW and RE-MOBILIZEW – investigated the efficacy and safety of 220 mg and 150 mg dabigatran etexilate once daily compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin as thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty [5,6,7]. Peripheral nerve blocks are being increasingly used during hip and knee arthroplasty [9], and may represent the future trend
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have