Abstract
This Article provides a look into the effects of the legalization of same-sex marriage on Louisiana’s family statutory regime. In 2015, same-sex marriage was legalized in the landmark case, Obergefell v. Hodges, which declared any state laws that prohibited the legal union of two people because of their gender or sexual orientation were unconstitutional. Thus, rather than marriage being only between a man and a woman, the scope of marriage was widened to include any two people of legal majority despite their gender. Despite this decision, many issues within the family concerning same-sex couples have not been contemplated; neither have state laws adjusted to address such matters. Using a Florida Supreme Court case, D.M.T. v. T.M.H., the author explored the issue of two mothers in a long-term domestic partnership, who later separated after having a child together using in vitro fertilization, making one the birth mother and the other the biological mother. With same sex marriage being recently legalized, what rules or laws will state courts use when deciding such an issue? How will they apply laws created for heterosexual couples to homosexual couples? Reviewing the majority’s decision in this case and the dissent’s reasoning, the author concludes that applying a set of laws for one class of people to another class may pose difficulties; nevertheless, solutions are possible. Thus, the author gives suggestions on how Louisiana laws (e.g., presumptions of paternity) could be changed to fit all family narratives making the jobs of factfinders, attorneys, and others easier and placing state policy makers at an advantage, i.e., the legislature creating new laws rather than the judiciary.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call