Abstract
The rates and pathways of chemical reactions at metal surfaces can be strongly influenced by energy dissipation due to the nonadiabatic excitation of metallic conduction electrons. The introduction of frictional forces to account for this dissipation has been quite successful in situations for which the nonadiabatic coupling is weak. However, in cases where nonadiabatic coupling is strong, such as when electron transfer occurs, the friction model is likely to break down. Ryabinkin and Izmaylov have proposed 2-state and 3-state alternatives to the friction model for introducing electronic dissipation in molecular dynamics simulations. Here, we examine their 2-state model using some simple examples of atom-surface scattering. We find that, with the addition of decoherence, the 2-state model can produce quite promising results.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
