Abstract

There is a growing tendency for industrial consumers to invest in both photovoltaic (PV) and energy storage systems (ESSs) to meet their electricity requirements. However, the uncertainty of load demand and PV output brings great challenges for ESS operation. In this paper, a stochastic model predictive control (MPC) approach-based energy management strategy for ESSs is proposed. A non-parametric probabilistic prediction method embedded in time series correlation is adopted to describe the uncertainty of load demand and PV output. Then, a two-stage energy management model is proposed aiming at minimizing the total operation cost. The upper stage can generate an hourly operation strategy for ESSs, while the lower stage focuses on a more detailed minute-level operation strategy. The hourly operation strategy is also used as a basis to guide the ESS operation in the lower stage. Besides, a chance constraint was introduced to achieve a win–win solution between PV power consumption and electricity tariff, while the terminal value constraint of the capacity of ESSs to better cope with the uncertainty beyond the prediction time window. Finally, the numerical results showed that the proposed method can achieve an effective ESS energy management strategy.

Highlights

  • In recent years, photovoltaic (PV) panels and energy storage systems (ESSs) have been increasingly invested in to meet the requirements of developing renewable energy (Barchi et al, 2018; Liu et al, 2018, 2020)

  • To sum up, focusing on minimizing electricity costs, this paper proposes a two-stage rolling energy management scheme that is driven by stochastic model predictive control (MPC)

  • Terminal Value Constraints Compared with the minute-level operation, the hourly operation strategy can better reflect the future requirement of the energy storage space in a longer prediction time window

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Photovoltaic (PV) panels and energy storage systems (ESSs) have been increasingly invested in to meet the requirements of developing renewable energy (Barchi et al, 2018; Liu et al, 2018, 2020). To apply the above general stochastic MPC model to the proposed two-stage energy management of ESSs, the following three aspects need to be figured out: 1) input variables, including the current load Dt, the current PV output PStolar, Max, and the electricity price Ct; 2) state variables, including the ESS SOC Et, the ESS charging power Pcthr, the ESS discharging power Pdt is, and the matching score of the ESS to the day-ahead schedule Gt; 3). Terminal Value Constraints Compared with the minute-level operation, the hourly operation strategy can better reflect the future requirement of the energy storage space in a longer prediction time window. It is unrealistic to use the 24-h look-ahead

CONCLUSION
Findings
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call