Two Cultures or One?: A Second Look at Kuhn's The Copernican Revolution

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessA Second LookTwo Cultures or One?: A Second Look at Kuhn's The Copernican RevolutionRobert S. WestmanRobert S. Westman Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 85, Number 1Mar., 1994 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/356728 Views: 46Total views on this site Citations: 23Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1994 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Ovanes Akopyan, Pietro Daniel Omodeo Introduction: Quis dixit ? The Vicissitudes of Authority in Early Modern Cosmology, Perspectives on Science 30, no.55 (Oct 2022): 819–825.https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_e_00560Pietro Daniel Omodeo Resources of Intellectual Legitimacy in Italian Cosmological Affairs: Cremonini and Bellarmine’s Authority Conflict ( c .1616), Perspectives on Science 30, no.55 (Oct 2022): 874–902.https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00563Pablo Melogno From Externalism to Internalism: The Historiographical Development of Thomas Kuhn, Foundations of Science 27, no.22 (Jun 2021): 371–385.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-021-09801-5Eli I. Lichtenstein (Mis)Understanding scientific disagreement: Success versus pursuit-worthiness in theory choice, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 85 (Feb 2021): 166–175.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.10.005Konstantinos Chatzigeorgiou How the Mind-World Problem Shaped the History of Science: A Historiographical Analysis of Edwin Arthur Burtt's The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science Part I, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (May 2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.05.002Robert S. Westman How Did Copernicus Become a Copernican?, Isis 110, no.22 (May 2019): 296–301.https://doi.org/10.1086/703410 Notes, (Sep 2013): 371–428.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139521499.021Robert S. Westman The Copernican Question Revisited: A Reply to Noel Swerdlow and John Heilbron, Perspectives on Science 21, no.11 (May 2013): 100–136.https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00087Vasso Kindi The Structure’s Legacy: Not from Philosophy to Description, Topoi 32, no.11 (Oct 2012): 81–89.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-012-9137-8J. L. Heilbron Robert Westman on Galileo and Related Matters, Perspectives on Science 20, no.33 (Sep 2012): 379–388.https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00072Xiang Chen A different kind of revolutionary change: transformation from object to process concepts, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41, no.22 (Jun 2010): 182–191.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.03.008By Gerald Holton George Sarton, His Isis, and the Aftermath FOCUS, Isis 100, no.11 (Jul 2015): 79–88.https://doi.org/10.1086/597571Vasso Kindi The Relation of History of Science to Philosophy of Science in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and Kuhn's later philosophical work, Perspectives on Science 13, no.44 (Dec 2005): 495–530.https://doi.org/10.1162/106361405775466117Maureen A. O’Malley, Yan Boucher Paradigm change in evolutionary microbiology, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36, no.11 (Mar 2005): 183–208.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.12.002Steven Vanden Broecke Astrological reform, Calvinism, and Cartesianism: Copernican astronomy in the Low Countries, 1550–1650, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35, no.22 (Jun 2004): 363–381.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2004.03.003Peter Barker Constructing Copernicus, Perspectives on Science 10, no.22 (Jun 2002): 208–227.https://doi.org/10.1162/106361402321147531Struan Jacobs Polanyi's presagement of the incommensurability concept, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33, no.11 (Mar 2002): 101–116.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00031-0Peter Barker Kuhn, Incommensurability, and Cognitive Science, Perspectives on Science 9, no.44 (Dec 2001): 433–462.https://doi.org/10.1162/106361401760375820Peter Barker Incommensurability and Conceptual Change during the Copernican Revolution, (Jan 2001): 241–273.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9680-0_10 Sheila J. Rabin Kepler's Attitude Toward Pico and the Anti-Astrology Polemic, Renaissance Quarterly 50, no.33 (Sep 2015): 750–770.https://doi.org/10.2307/3039261Mara Beller Criticism and Revolutions, Science in Context 10, no.11 (Sep 2008): 13–37.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700002519Mara Beller Criticism and Revolutions, Science in Context 10, no.11 (Sep 2008): 13–37.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700000247 Book Reviews, Interesting Publications, Secretary's Reports, Earth Sciences History 14, no.11 (Jan 1995): 103–133.https://doi.org/10.17704/eshi.14.1.636x60p6160q15x5