Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility has multiple faces that contradict each other. On the one hand there is the communication of great aspirations and ambitions. On the other hand, there is the unruly practice that complicates living up to those ambitions. These contradictions are, without being exhaustive, caused by a focus on economic performance, organizational behavior, adherence to leading supply chain paradigms, and reputation management. In general, corporate communication about social responsibility is perceived as hypocritical. This research looks at how these communications initiate sustainability measures in the distribution and supply chain functions of a large multinational company. In a single embedded case study, data collection took place using semi-structured interviews complemented with document research. The empirical results show that the supply chain managers were positively critical of the communication about implemented sustainability measures and considered them as an invitation to act. However, they assessed the organization that surrounded them to be less lenient due to the different objectives of the various functions. The respondents diverged about which sustainability measures to apply and embed in the supply chain organization. It became clear that the knowledge base of the respondents was fragmented and incoherent. Reflecting on the research results, the role of top management seems crucial when it comes to coherent policy, knowledge development, and the prioritization of sustainability measures.

Highlights

  • Mission statements and communications from large international companies are commingled with aspirations in relation to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): combating climate change, social involvement, and environmental sustainability

  • Regarding the first construct of our study, the results show that CSR communication of the case organization had a mobilizing effect on supply chain managers

  • The supply chain managers indicated that they needed support from top management, which is confirmed by Graafland and Smid [35], who argue that there is a positive link between a CSR policy and its implementation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mission statements and communications from large international companies are commingled with aspirations in relation to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): combating climate change, social involvement, and environmental sustainability. From this perspective, CSR entails of a series of social and environmental activities that companies implement on a voluntary basis to address social and environmental concerns in their activities and the expectations of stakeholders [1], cited in [2], Concrete practices are visible in the supply chains that conflict with the ambitions with regards to corporate social responsibility. Likewise, globalized supply chains comprise the risk of social misconduct, such as unethical working conditions, low wages, and irregular working hours [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call