Abstract
Attentional deficits following stroke are common and pervasive, and are important predictors for functional recovery. Attentional functions comprise a set of specific cognitive processes allowing to attend, filter and select among a continuous stream of stimuli. These mechanisms are fundamental for more complex cognitive functions such as learning, planning and cognitive control, all crucial for daily functioning. The distributed functional neuroanatomy of these processes is a likely explanation for the high prevalence of attentional impairments following stroke, and underscores the importance of a clinical implementation of computational approaches allowing for sensitive and specific modeling of attentional sub-processes. The Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) offers a theoretical, computational, neuronal and practical framework to assess the efficiency of visual selection performance and parallel processing of multiple objects. Here, in order to assess the sensitivity and reliability of TVA parameters reflecting short-term memory capacity (K), processing speed (C) and perceptual threshold (t0), we used a whole-report paradigm in a cross-sectional case-control comparison and across six repeated assessments over the course of a three-week computerized cognitive training (CCT) intervention in chronic stroke patients (> 6 months since hospital admission, NIHSS ≤ 7 at hospital discharge). Cross-sectional group comparisons documented lower short-term memory capacity, lower processing speed and higher perceptual threshold in patients (n = 70) compared to age-matched healthy controls (n = 140). Further, longitudinal analyses in stroke patients during the course of CCT (n = 54) revealed high reliability of the TVA parameters, and higher processing speed at baseline was associated with larger cognitive improvement after the intervention. The results support the feasibility, reliability and sensitivity of TVA-based assessment of attentional functions in chronic stroke patients.
Highlights
Attentional deficits following stroke are common, pervasive and persistent (Barker-Collo et al, 2010a), likely due to the distributed functional neuroanatomy supporting the range of attentional sub-functions (Rosenberg et al, 2017)
We combined a cross-sectional case-control comparison in 70 chronic stroke patients who suffered mild to moderate stroke (>6 months since hospital admission, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS; Lyden et al, 2009) ≤ 7 at hospital discharge) and healthy controls (n = 140) with a longitudinal assessment during the course of a computerized cognitive training (CCT), in which 54 of the stroke patients completed an intensive CCT program and were either assigned to an active transcranial direct current stimulation or sham-tDCS condition in order to test for putative beneficial effects of brain stimulation in combination with CCT (Kolskår et al, 2020)
At group level, patients who suffered mild to moderate stroke, defined here with a NIHSS score below or equal to seven at the hospital discharge, showed reduced performance compared to age-matched controls, suggesting that attentional deficits are present in patients suffering from relatively mild stroke
Summary
Attentional deficits following stroke are common, pervasive and persistent (Barker-Collo et al, 2010a), likely due to the distributed functional neuroanatomy supporting the range of attentional sub-functions (Rosenberg et al, 2017). Specific functions of attention, such as the ability to rapidly detect changes in perceptual scenes, or internally sustain focus over several stimuli over an extended period, are fundamental to more complex operations supporting everyday functions such as learning, social interactions and cognitive performance in general, and are important predictors for functional recovery in stroke patients (Peers et al, 2020). Given the high prevalence of attentional impairments in the acute and chronic stages of stroke and the relevance of attentional functions as a predictor of recovery and everyday functions, there is a need to identify specific and reliable behavioral markers of attentional abilities in individual patients.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
