Abstract
ABSTRACT Secondary poisoning with anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) has been identified as an important threat for raptor conservation worldwide. In 2019, the California State Legislature passed Assembly Bill 1788 (made effective in 2020), which prohibits or limits the use of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) in the state, as a follow-up to the California Department of Pesticide Regulation’s ban on SGARS implemented in 2014. Currently, the adherence to these recent restrictions on ARs in southern California is unknown. To assess whether these bans prevented exposure of raptors and other wildlife to ARs, we investigated (1) the prevalence of exposure to eight different ARs in the blood of Turkey Vultures (Cathartes aura) before and after the 2019 ban, and (2) the distribution of resighted (encountered) wing-tagged Turkey Vultures included in this study to assess where exposure might occur. Of 27 Turkey Vultures tested for eight ARs, one out of 11 sampled in 2017 had detectable (trace) but not quantifiable levels of difethialone, and two out of 16 (12.5%) sampled in 2021 had detectable levels of diphacinone (one had 8 ppb; another indicated as positive without quantification). Overall, the prevalence of exposure to ARs was 11.1% (3 of 27), 7.4% for diphacinone and 3.7% for difethialone. Based on 93 resightings of 20 of the wing-tagged Turkey Vultures, all but one remained within the areas of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Orange, Riverside, and San Diego Counties of southern California. Our study suggests that the exposure risk of Turkey Vultures to ARs persisted despite recent restrictions. Our small sample size and reliance on blood in live vultures rather than liver tissue in dead ones may be underestimating true ARs exposure in our study population. We propose a continued and integrated monitoring approach that includes measurements of ARs in both free-ranging (blood samples) and deceased (liver samples) Turkey Vultures for effective large-scale monitoring. This approach will assess compliance with current and future bans and regulations regarding the use of these poisons in California.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
