Turbulent superstructure statistics in a turbulent boundary layer with pressure gradients

Abstract

In turbulent boundary layers, streamwise elongated regions of high- and low-momentum in the log-law layer that can extent up to several boundary layer thicknesses are often referred to as turbulent superstructures. These structures contain a relatively large portion of the layer’s turbulent kinetic energy and have been shown to interact with the near-wall flow structures. In the last few decades extensive research on zero-pressure gradient (ZPG) turbulent boundary layers has been done, however by comparison, the structural characteristics for adverse pressure gradient turbulent (APG) boundary layer flows are much less studied despite their strong significance aero-hydrodynamic vehicle design. Therefore, the three-dimensional dynamics of turbulent superstructures in a turbulent boundary layer flow are investigated in the Atmospheric Wind Tunnel Munich (AWM) using a multi-camera 3D time-resolved Lagrangian particle tracking approach. In this study, Lagrangian and Eulerian statistics will be used to characterize the dynamics and interaction of turbulent superstructures within a zero pressure gradient (ZPG) turbulent boundary layer at Reτ = 5000 or Reθ = 14 000 that then flows over a curved plate subjected to a favorable (FPG) and strong adverse (APG) pressure gradient, which eventually separates. An Eulerian analysis, using multi-point correlations of 3D velocity fields, found that the average superstructure topology is modulated by decelerating flow in the APG region when compared to the ZPG region, however the basic shape and spanwise pattern is preserved. Looking into the behavior of individual trajectories, it was found that the dispersion of single particles along trajectories in the log-law layer are capable of moving more than the average Eulerian superstructure spacing in the spanwise direction. Furthermore, the mean square of the single particle dispersion indicates that the maximum dispersion in the spanwise direction comes from particles released at the wall-normal location corresponding to the so-called “second-peak/plateau” region in the streamwise normal Reynolds stress.