Abstract
Abstract This article discusses the recent decision of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal in Zhang Hong Li and others v DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Limited and others that has rejected the idea of a ‘residual’ or ‘high-level supervisory’ obligation upon trustees and accordingly endorsed the effectiveness of a well-drawn anti-Bartlett clause that sought to exclude any obligation upon the trustee to intervene in the management of an underlying company other than in the case of actual knowledge of dishonesty.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.