Abstract
Abstract In Siu Yin Kwan v Eastern Insurance, Lord Lloyd addressed the question of whether assignment can appropriately be analogised with undisclosed agency. His Lordship considered it could not. Although scholars have impliedly (and correctly) identified that this is true as regards statutory assignment, there are compelling parallels between undisclosed agency and equitable assignment that merit further attention. This article inquires into the accuracy of Lord Lloyd’s dictum in relation to equitable assignment, seeking to identify a possible model to conceptualise the flow of rights arising between an undisclosed principal and a third party in undisclosed agency relationships.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
