Abstract

Mostly unsubstantiated claims have been made that non‐traditional methods of horsemanship have much to offer as models for leadership. The claims include the achievement of rapid and efficient interactions in which trust is gained between the human and unridden foals, or even between human and horses with fear of human contact. A study has begun to explore the relationship between the so‐called ‘join‐up’ approach, and creative leadership. The basic principles of the two approaches have been compared and contrasted in pilot studies with managers on development courses. Preliminary results suggest that creative leadership, and the join‐up approach, have many features in common. A particularly significant similarity is that they are both trust‐based approaches, contrasting with more traditional approaches of human and horse management, in which the goals of the leader/trainer are achieved through reinforcement of power and through the exercise of coercive methods of maintaining dominance. The study raises deep ethical questions of how leaders deal with those over whom they have some power, and for whom they have responsibilities. We conclude that creative leadership, and trust‐based methods of horsemanship achieve involvement and cooperation by psychologically healthy means.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.